President Donald J. Trump attends the 38th annual National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service Wednesday, May 15, 2019, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

Wednesday, May 22, 2019

Democrat's Star Trump Hater and Media Adored So-Called Defender of Women, Michael Avenatti, Stole $300k from Stripper Stormy Daniels

He partied her money away while she had to take her clothes off in strip clubs to pay her bills.  Nothing new for Avenatti. He stole money from a disabled client too!

Michael Avenatti was a media darling when he used stripper Stormy Daniels to attack Trump and put forward a phony witness who later recanted after accusing Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct during his confirmation for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court.  He appeared on CNN and MSNBC 108 times.  They LOVED HIM, as witnessed in the montage below:

The Trump hating media couldn't get enough of him and he even considered running for President. Why not? The Dem nomination fight is a free for all freak show. What's one more?

But now, the dark side of Avenatti is out. He's been charged with multiple felonies relating to extortion and theft. He has ZERO credibility as a truth teller on Trump. And every media star who hitched their crediblity to his should resign in disgrace. But since these Trump haters have no shame, what's another lie after telling SO MANY!

Attorney General Barr Getting Close to Source of Dem's Corrupt Attempt to Frame Trump: Obama White House Meeting w/ Coup Plotters

All roads lead to Obama!

Last week Attorney General Barr made a very interesting statement in an interview with Bill Hemmer:
HEMMER: In the period of time between Election Day and the inauguration. Did anyone in government or in intelligence did they take action to justify their decisions?

BARR: Between. Election Day - Did you say?

HEMMER: Between Election Day of 2016 in November and inauguration day.

BARR: I think there were some very strange developments during that period. That's one of the things we want to look into.

HEMMER: Such as?

BARR: Such as the handling of the meeting on January 6 between the intelligence chiefs and the president and the leaking of information subsequent to that meeting.

HEMMER: Was that meeting in New York City?

BARR: Yes.

HEMMER: In Trump Tower?

BARR: Yes.
What Barr did not mention was what happened the day before that meeting on January 6th at Trump Tower. The day before in the Oval Office Obama, Biden, Yates, Clapper, Brennan, Comey and Rice gathered to plan strategy on how to share information about the infamous Steele Dossier with Trump. That curious meeting was memorialized in a very odd email National Security Adviser sent to herself minutes after Trump was sworn in as President. Questions about what was actually discussed remain.

Meanwhile, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is accusing Trump of a "cover up." Methinks she doth protest too much. It's clear where the real cover up is coming from and it's not Trump!

If President Trump's Son Was linked to Drugs It Would Be Front Page News. If It's Biden's Son, It's Never Mentioned

A media obsessed with hating everything Trump could care less when Dems do wrong!

This is interesting:
Hunter Biden was thrown out of the U.S. Navy in 2014 for testing positive for cocaine. Hardly a whimper in the media. Days before the 2016 election he returns a rental car but leaves behind multiple ID's, a badge and drug paraphernalia.

But you're not going to hear much about this. In previous Joe Biden scandals Mika Brzezinski who leads the Trump hating media at MSNBC has announced "I refuse to give it any more time." No doubt she and the rest of the media will sweep this under the rug too.

Imagine if it was one of Trump's children. You can imagine the hearings Dems would be announcing to get to the bottom of why no charges were filed!

Wednesday, May 15, 2019

Trump-Barr 2020?

If Mike Pence can be persuaded to go on the U.S. Supreme Court when RBG retires!

Saw a comment on Twitter which made me wonder.....

Especially after Attorney General Barr asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi at an event on the U.S. Capitol Grounds if she "brought handcuffs" in reference to her recent threat to have the Sgt. of Arms arrest him.   

Where Is the Special Prosecutor To Look Into Biden's Family Dealings With China and Ukraine?

Or do we only hold Trump, his family and associates accountable?
And in Ukraine? Reporting by John Solomon at The Hill:
Two years after leaving office, Joe Biden couldn’t resist the temptation last year to brag to an audience of foreign policy specialists about the time as vice president that he strong-armed Ukraine into firing its top prosecutor.

In his own words, with video cameras rolling, Biden described how he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.

“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling Poroshenko.

“Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,” Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations event, insisting that President Obama was in on the threat.
Ukrainian officials tell me there was one crucial piece of information that Biden must have known but didn’t mention to his audience: The prosecutor he got fired was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings that employed Biden’s younger son, Hunter, as a board member.

U.S. banking records show Hunter Biden’s American-based firm, Rosemont Seneca Partners LLC, received regular transfers into one of its accounts — usually more than $166,000 a month — from Burisma from spring 2014 through fall 2015, during a period when Vice President Biden was the main U.S. official dealing with Ukraine and its tense relations with Russia.

The general prosecutor’s official file for the Burisma probe — shared with me by senior Ukrainian officials — shows prosecutors identified Hunter Biden, business partner Devon Archer and their firm, Rosemont Seneca, as potential recipients of money.

Shokin told me in written answers to questions that, before he was fired as general prosecutor, he had made “specific plans” for the investigation that “included interrogations and other crime-investigation procedures into all members of the executive board, including Hunter Biden.”
Trump associate Paul Manafort is in jail today because of his conviction on charges related to Ukraine. Why does Joe Biden's son get a pass? And why does former Vice President Joe Biden openly brag about his role without any scrutiny?

If Biden was a Republican Democrats in Congress would be issuing subpoenas for the banking records of his grandchildren as they threaten to do with Trump. To say this is a double standard is an understatement.

Surely, as Democrats have said the past two years no one has anything to fear from an investigation if they have done nothing wrong. Those accused, or even under suspicion, in matters relating to Trump have spent tens of thousands on lawyers to protect themselves from the onslaught of prosecutorial and Dem investigation zealotry. If Biden and family have done nothing wrong, then let's appoint a Special Prosecutor to look into it. While we are at it, examine the obvious conflicts of all the Dem 2020 candidates. That's fair isn't it?

Saturday, May 11, 2019

Hypocrisy Alert. In Their Own Words Dems Make Best Defense for Attorney General Barr

Either what they said before IN UNISON was based on principle or it's just politics and what they say today can be totally ignored!

Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff and the Dems all chorltling about a "witch hunt" and how fast the GOP is advancing the case against Holder. Compare the more than EIGHT MONTHS the GOP House spent negotiating with the Obama Administration at that time to the less than three weeks Dems spent with Barr.

A reminder of just how different these two cases are to highlight not only utter hypocrisy but totally unprincipled, political stand:

Nadler's show trial, not Barr, deserves to be held in contempt

...Congress invokes official contempt charges rarely, indeed only three times in the past 35 years. It is meant to be a last resort. But in 2012, the last time it was used, Attorney General Eric Holder was held in contempt for refusing to provide Congress with subpoenaed material, and Holder was a Democrat. So this is payback. But it should be noted that Holder had by then defied Congress for 203 days before House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., first formally threatened him with contempt charges. Even then, Issa gave Holder an additional 48 days before his committee actually held a vote. And Issa was demanding answers about a Justice Department scandal that had actually resulted in the murder of at least one government official.

In shockingly sharp contrast, Nadler went from subpoena to contempt vote in 19 days, without evincing any desire to negotiate with the Justice Department over what could properly be shared by the committee. Nadler isn’t approaching this as one in which he should work out an agreement between two co-equal branches of government, which would be perfectly possible in this case if both sides were willing to be reasonable. Instead, he’s running a show trial to gin up enthusiasm among angry Democratic donors, both small and large.

What's more, and worse, is that Nadler's show trial is in pursuit of an end that is manifestly wrong. Barr’s efforts to protect privileged grand jury materials are not only justifiable but specifically mandated by law. Nadler has not a leg to stand on. Every single House Democrat on that committee knows and understands this. Yet not one objected to the circus in which they played the role of sundry clowns.
In the video Pelosi said then that the Congress should be working to get jobs for the American people, not engaging in witch hunts. Since the Dems took over, they've done NOTHING but the witch hunt. Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-MD) leads a chant at the end of the video "SHAME ON YOU." Yes, the shame should fall on these witch hunt hoaxsters who don't care about the American people!

Friday, May 10, 2019

Students Walk Out of Colorado Vigil for Shooting Victim After Organizers Attempted to Turn It Into Political Rally

Students were in tears trying to mourn their classmate but all the gun grabbers wanted to do is sell a phony political agenda!

These People Don't See a Child, They See Skin Color: Dem Media Racists Use Royal Baby to Advance Racial Agenda

Everything is about race to these racists!

Those are the famous words of Dr. Martin Luther King from his "I have a dream" speech. Powerful words that are lost on Democrats and their media allies who ALWAYS see skin color first.

Remember when then Sen. Joe Biden described Obama as "the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy." Race was the first thing on Joe's mind. No coincidence I suppose that he has a record of opposing school segregation. It works the other way too. Rep. Al Green (D-TX) told a panel testifying at a committee hearing: "You appear to be white men. I may be mistaken. If one among you happens to be something other than a white male, would you kindly extend a hand into the air? Kindly let the record reflect that there are no hands in the air and that the panel is made up of white men."

These attitudes pervade the Democrat Party from top to bottom. Everything from safe spaces on campus with "no whites allowed" to now, a racist view of the baby born to Prince Harry and Meghan this week:

Tuesday, May 07, 2019

Their Racism is Showing: Dems Attack Trump for Giving Tiger Woods Medal of Freedom and Attack Woods for Accepting It

Same people had no problem when Obama passed out the award to campaign donors and Hollywood celebrities!

THE PRESIDENT: This evening we are in the presence of a true legend, an extraordinary athlete who has transformed golf and achieved new levels of dominance. He’s also a great person. He’s a great guy. Tiger introduced countless new people to the sport of golf, from every background and from every walk of life. He inspired millions of young Americans with his thrilling wire to wire victories.

Tiger Woods is a global symbol of American excellence, devotion, and drive. Tiger endured knee surgery and four excruciating back surgeries. I know that you remember too. That’s not good. But it ended up good. Including a spinal fusion in 2017. He fell from number one in the world rankings to 1,199th. I don’t believe that even if he had one leg, I don’t believe that.

Tiger’s injuries were so profound that for two years he could barely swing a club. As Tiger said, “There was a point in time I didn’t know if I’d ever do this again,” if he’d ever play again. But Tiger fought through the terrible pain, and he fought all the way back to the summit of golf.
Tiger Woods is one of the greatest golfers in history. He broke the race barrier for blacks in a mostly all white sport forever and has inspired young people to work hard to overcome obstacles to success. He is an American success story worthy of this honor.

Unfortunately, racists in the Dem media will tar and feather any black man or woman who dares to succeed without giving their white masters the credit. Those who refuse to kow tow to the party line will be maligned and vilified. Instead of celebrating with Tiger Woods on behalf of all young people seeking to succeed some in the media used the award to attack both Tiger and Trump. In their media world, black people are supposed to hate Trump as much as they do. If they don't they become a target for hate!

Here's the new rule: Trump is a racist if he gives a black man an award. He would also be a racist if he did not.

Sen. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Trump-Russia: CASE CLOSED

But Mitch was pleased to see so many Democrats suddenly discover Russia as a threat. Where were they when Obama was President?

Sen. Mitch McConnell isn't known for impassioned speeches.  Saying his speaking style is "dry" is an understatement. But he does a masterful job of presenting facts and making his argument.

I started listening to this speech and was captivated. See what you think:
MCCONNELL:“It’s now been more than six weeks since Special Counsel Bob Mueller, the former FBI director, concluded his investigation into Russia’s interference in our 2016 election and delivered his findings to the Justice Department. It’s been two weeks since Attorney General William Barr made the 450-page report public. This investigation went on for two years. It’s finally over. Many Americans were waiting to see how their elected officials would respond.

“With an exhaustive investigation complete, would the country finally unify to confront the real challenges before us? Would we finally be able to move on from partisan paralysis and breathless conspiracy theorizing? Or would we remain consumed by unhinged partisanship, and keep dividing ourselves to the point that Putin and his agents need only stand on the sidelines and watch as their job is done for them? Regrettably, the answer is pretty obvious. So that’s what I want to discuss this morning. Russia’s interference in American elections. The work of the Special Counsel and the Attorney General. And how we can finally end this ‘Groundhog Day’ spectacle, stop endlessly re-litigating a two-and-a-half-year-old election result, and move forward for the American people.

“Now, it bears remembering what this investigation was actually supposed to be about: Russian interference in 2016. For many of the president’s opponents, it quickly morphed into something else. A last hope that maybe they’d never have to come to terms with the American people’s choice of a president. In some corners, Special Counsel Mueller came to be regarded as a kind of a secular saint, destined to rescue the country from the inconvenient truth that the American people actually elected Donald Trump. For two years, many of the president’s opponents seemed to be hoping the worst conspiracy theories were actually true. They seemed to be hoping for a national crisis for the sake of their own politics.

“Now look, I will say, it was at least heartening to see many of my Democratic colleagues and the media abruptly awaken to the dangers of Russian aggression. An awakening to the dangers of Russian aggression. Remember, not long ago, Democrats mocked Republicans like John McCain and Mitt Romney for warning about the dangers posed by Putin’s Russia. Remember President Obama’s quip in 2012 when then-Governor Romney emphasized his concerns with Russia? Here’s what President Obama said when Mitt Romney emphasized his concerns with Russia back in 2012. Direct quote, ‘The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back.’ That was President Obama in 2012.

“Well, I think many of us now see that President Obama’s approach to Russia could have used some more of the 1980s in it. More Ronald Reagan and less Jimmy Carter. We’d have been better off if the Obama Administration hadn’t swept Putin’s invasion and occupation of Georgia under the rug or looked away as Russia forced out western NGOs and cracked down on civil society. If President Obama hadn’t let Assad trample his ‘red line’ on Syria or embraced Putin’s fake deal on chemical weapons. If the Obama Administration had responded firmly to Putin’s invasion and occupation of Ukraine in 2014; to the assassination of Boris Nemtsov in 2015; and to Russia’s intervention in Syria.

“Maybe stronger leadership would have left the Kremlin less emboldened. Maybe tampering with our democracy wouldn’t have seemed so very tempting. Instead, the previous administration sent the Kremlin the signal they could get away with almost anything. So is it surprising that we got the brazen interference detailed in Special Counsel Mueller’s report? A concerted effort to divide Americans through social media campaigns. Hacking into the e-mail accounts and networks of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party.

“Thanks to the investigation, we know more about these tactics. Thanks to the investigation, 13 Russian nationals, three Russian companies, and 12 more Russian intelligence officers have been indicted. These are the people who really did seek to undermine our democracy. Yet, curiously, many of our Democratic colleagues and most of the news media don’t really seem to care about that. New insight into defending America? Russian nationals indicted? Doesn’t seem to interest my colleagues across the aisle. No interest. Just like there’s been little interest in the steps this administration has taken to make Russia pay for its interference and strengthen America’s hand.

“Election interference was just one part in Russia’s strategy to undercut the United States. And this administration has taken the problem head-on. We have a new, coherent National Security Strategy and National Defense Strategy that take this threat seriously. We have new sanctions. We’ve provided Georgia and Ukraine weapons to better defend themselves – capabilities the previous administration denied our partners – now listen to this -- out of fear of provoking Russia. We’ve worked against pipeline projects like Nord Stream 2 that would further expand Putin’s influence. We’re strengthening and reforming NATO so the alliance can present a united front. We proved Russia’s non-compliance with the INF and walked away from a treaty that Moscow had made into a sham.

“And the Trump Administration has, over Russian objections, twice enforced President Obama’s red line in Syria after Assad’s use of chemical weapons. With respect to election security: Congress appropriated hundreds of millions of dollars to state governments to shore up their systems. The administration increased information-sharing from the Department of Homeland Security in cooperation with the states. And according to press reports, the Department of Defense has expanded its capabilities and authorities to thwart cyber threats to our democracy. No longer will we just hope Moscow respects our sovereignty; we will defend it. These are just a few examples. There’s already evidence they’re having an effect.

“We just had the 2018 midterm elections. Thanks to this administration’s leadership, all 50 states and more than 1,400 local election jurisdictions focused on election security like never before. DHS provided resources to localities for better cybersecurity and private social media companies monitored their own platforms for foreign interference. Thanks to efforts across the federal government, in 2018, we were ready. That clearly is progress. The Mueller Report will help us. So will the upcoming report from the Select Committee on Intelligence. These threats and challenges are real. Our responsibility to strengthen America is serious. And it requires serious work.

“But seriousness is not what we’ve seen from the Democratic Party in recent days. What we’ve seen is a meltdown. An inability to accept the bottom-line conclusion on Russian interference from the Special Counsel's report: ‘the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.’ That’s the conclusion. Two years of exhaustive investigation, and nothing to establish the fanciful conspiracy theory that Democratic politicians and TV talking heads had treated like a foregone conclusion. They told everyone there’d been a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign. Yet on this central question, the Special Counsel’s finding is clear: Case closed. Case closed.

“This ought to be good news for everyone. But my Democratic colleagues seem to be publicly working through the five stages of grief. The first stage is ‘denial.’ Remember what happened when the Attorney General released his preliminary letter describing the Special Counsel’s bottom-line legal conclusions? Denial. Immediately, totally baseless speculation that perhaps Attorney General Barr hadn’t quoted the report properly. But then, comes stage two. ‘Anger.’ Welcome to Washington D.C. in recent days. The Democrats are angry. Angry that the facts disappointed them. Angry that our legal system will not magically undo the 2016 election for them.

“And they’ve opted to channel all their partisan anger onto the Attorney General. They seem to be angrier at Bill Barr for doing his job than they are at Vladimir Putin. This is a distinguished public servant whose career stretches back almost 50 years. He’s widely respected. Nobody claims he has any prior personal allegiance to this president. And why are they angry? Did the Attorney General fire the Special Counsel or force him to wind down prematurely? No. Did he sit on the Mueller Report and keep it secret? No, he quickly reported out its bottom-line legal conclusions and then released as much as possible for the world to see. Did he use redactions to mislead the public? No. Working with the Special Counsel’s team he released as much as possible within standard safeguards.

“So it’s hard to see the source of this anger. Maybe my Democratic colleagues are thinking of some strange new kind of ‘cover up’ -- where you take the entire thing you’re supposedly covering up and post it on the Internet. The claims get more and more utterly absurd. Baseless accusations of perjury. Laughable threats of impeachment. Look, we all know what’s going on here. This is the whole angry barrage that Democrats had prepared to unleash on President Trump. Except the facts let them down. And so the left has swung all those cannons around and fired them at the Attorney General. Not for any legitimate reason. Just because he’s a convenient target.

“So look, there’s this ‘outrage industrial complex’ that spans from Capitol press conferences to cable news. They are grieving -- grieving -- that the national crisis they spent two years wishing for did not materialize. But for the rest of the country, this is good news. Bad news for the ‘outrage industrial complex,’ but good news for the country. So, now they’re slandering a distinguished public servant because the real world has disappointed them. Instead of taking a deep breath and coming back to reality, our colleagues across the aisle want to shoot the messenger and keep the perpetual outrage machine right on going. Even undermining the institution of the Attorney General itself in the process.

Remember, Russia set out to sow discord. To create chaos in American politics and undermine confidence in our democracy. But, on that front, given the left’s total fixation on delegitimizing the president Americans chose and shooting any messenger who tells them inconvenient truths, I’m afraid the Russians hardly need to lift a finger. Well, the last stage of grief is ‘acceptance.’ For the country’s sake, I hope my Democratic friends get there soon. There are serious issues the American people need us to tackle. There is more progress for middle-class families that we need to deliver.

“For two years, the Democratic Party held out hope that the legal system would undo their loss in 2016. They refused to make peace with the American people’s choice. But the American people elected this president. They did. The American people voted for change. The American people sent us here to deliver results for their families. That’s what Republicans have been doing for the past two years and counting. It’s what Republicans will continue to do. And whenever our Democratic friends can regain their composure and come back to reality, we look forward to their help.”

Today's Democrats are doing Putin's bidding. That much is clear. But then, Dems have ALWAYS been soft on the Russians!

Monday, May 06, 2019

Muslim American Society Video Shows Children Taught to Hate

Brainwashing the next generation of America hating jihadis!

Remember when school children were taught to sing praise to Obama?  This is worse!

“We will defend the land of divine guidance with our bodies, and we will sacrifice our souls without hesitation,” she said, according to MEMRI. “We will chop off their heads, and we will liberate the sorrowful and exalted Al-Aqsa Mosque. We will lead the army of Allah fulfilling His promise, and we will subject them to eternal torture.”

Imagine if a group of Christians gathered in a public school and said we are about to slaughter our enemies. The children and their parents and teachers would all be arrested. But this group still has a Facebook and Twitter page.

These Two Members of Congress Are Mouthpieces for Hamas Terrorist Propaganda. They Should Be Expelled!

There's hardly a day that goes by when Reps. Talib and Omar don't make anti-Semitic and anti-American statements!

700 hundred rockets were fired into Israel by Hamas terrorists in Gaza the last several days.  The attacks began after so-called protesters at the Gaza border with Israel provoked a reaction by Israel.

Despite all that two Democrat congresswomen used their position to spread Hamas propaganda. The worst, as usual, is Omar who was rescued by the United States from Somalia:

Hypocrisy Parade: CNN's Cillizaa Suggests Trump Won't Concede if He Loses in 2020

Exactly what does he think Dems have been doing for the past two and a half years?
Remember the media outrage overdrive when Trump said in an October 2016 debate with Hillary Clinton that he might not concede if he lost? Hillary pounced:
“That’s horrifying,” Mrs. Clinton replied. “Let’s be clear about what he is saying and what that means. He is denigrating — he is talking down our democracy. And I am appalled that someone who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that position.” Hillary added: “That is not the way our democracy works.”
Yet ever since Trump was elected in an Electoral College landslide Hillary and the Democrats have been engaged in a "horrifying" denial of democracy. And they are still doing it. Efforts are underway in several states to end participation in the Electoral College. And Hillary is STILL saying the election was "stolen" from her.

The real danger to democracy is coming from the Democrats!

Friday, May 03, 2019

Things Are About to Get Interesting

Remember When Global Warming Alarmists Said Snow Was a "Thing of the Past?"

Spring snow in the U.S. and Britain put the lie to that one!

How many years have the predictors of climate doom and gloom been telling us that "snow is a thing of the past"? (1,2) In 2000, a British publication whined "children just aren't going to know what snow is." Democrats in the U.S. Senate picked up the script and went to the floor of the Senate over the past 20 years to sing the same song. Climate hysterics went so far as to tell children that "Christmas was canceled" in an ad where Santa Claus said the North Pole was melting. That scaremongering might have helped the recruitment effort for young propagandists but reality has a hard way of catching up with the lies.

In Britain this week it snowed. IN MAY:

In Chicago April 27 snow was the latest accumulating snow in over 25 years:

Obviously snow is not a "thing of the past." Like very other alarmist prediction from the sky is falling crowd NOT ONE has come true. The Arctic is not melting, polar bears are not endangered. Sea levels are not rising at an increasing level. Hurricanes, tornadoes, drought, wildfires are not increasing. Warming isn't the problem. Cooling might be. One thing you can bet on: if a cooling cycle does occur climate hysterics will demand a carbon tax to address it. They're not about to give up that gravy train of riches!

Grassley to Dems: "The Jig is Up" The Big Lie on Trump Has Been Exposed

Poor Democrats. They've been lying for so long about Trump they can't stop!

Chuck Grassley: So I think here’s where we are, the Democrats and you folks in the media, are not concerned about the report. I think the results were not what you expected. And I think you’re finding out that everybody was sold a bunch of snake oil and now the jig’s up.”

Democrats Call Attorney General Barr a "Liar" Yet Have Not Viewed Full Mueller Report

Clearly their motives are not based on facts, but naked politics!

So, Attorney General Barr testifies before the U.S. Senate this week where Democrats called him every name in the book. Sen. Mazie Hirona (D-HI) who never met a lie she didn't like when it was directed at Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearing for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court accused Barr of lying and being in Trump's pocket. She wasn't alone. The rest of the preening 2020 presidential Dem wanabees echoed the same remarks as if they were reading from a script. It's likely that's exactly what they were doing.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi got her copy of the script too. She accused Barr of lying to Congress and insisted he should be prosecuted.  Pelosi wasn't clear on what Barr lied about but who cares right?

What's odd is that these same supposed seekers of truth have not bothered to read the full Mueller report which they can do by visiting a special room in the Justice Department where sensitive documents are kept.  Republicans have been the ONLY visitors.   But then, that's just further proof that this isn't about whether Barr mislead Americans about the Mueller report, it's a transparent political attack.

And when Democrats had the opportunity to chastise Obama's Attorney General who was held in contempt for lying to Congress they gave him a pass. So did the Democrat media:

Hillary Clinton Invites Chinese to Interfere in 2020 Election. Where is the Special Prosecutor?

Shouldn't Hillary be held to the same standard as Trump?

When Trump joked about the Russians finding Hillary's missing emails Democrats pounced. They said it was proof that Trump was colluding with Russia to interfere in the 2016 election.

So what about this?

MADDOW: "So why should Russia have all the fun? And since Russia is clearly backing Republicans, why don't we ask China to back us?'

"I hereby tonight ask China—" Maddow said, imitating the hypothetical situation.

"That's right," Clinton said. "And not only that, China, if you're listening, why don't you get Trump's tax returns? I'm sure our media would richly reward you.
OK, where is the special prosecutor digging through every aspect of Hillary's life and that of her family and associates now that she's openly colluding with China?

Friday, April 26, 2019

Earth Day Climate Hysterics Ignore Failed Predictions of the Past; Insist AGAIN We're All Going to Die Without a Carbon Tax!

Nearly every year for 30 years they've said we have only ten years to save the planet.  I guess these alarmists aren't very good at math. 

Earth Day in the U.S. came and went this week with barely a whimper.  However, in the United Kingdom climate hysterics have spent the week tying up traffic, thus driving up carbon emissions, and doing other insane things. One woman even glued her breasts to the sidewalk to stop traffic.  What some lefties will do for attention!

In the U.S. the obligatory scaremongering "news" stories suddenly leapt to the front of Google newsfeeds. I noticed this one on the top of my phone's feed:
We're losing the war on climate change
Analysis by John D. Sutter, CNN

...[T]he scale of the outrage in no way matches the magnitude of this disaster, which, like WWII, threatens to cripple or even obliterate human life on the planet as we know it.

We've known the truth about climate change -- that people are burning fossil fuels and warming the atmosphere, with potentially catastrophic consequences -- for decades now. James Hansen testified about the dangers of global warming when he was an NASA scientist in 1988. The New York Times headline: "Global Warming Has Begun, Expert Tells Senate."

Since then, the eco-woke among us have created more than enough deadlines to try to force change. In 1990, as George Marshall wrote in his book "Don't Even Think About It," the magazine Ecologist published a book called "5,000 Days to Save the Planet." About 5,000 days later, the Institute for Public Policy Research declared that there were "Ten Years to Save the Planet." In 2008, he wrote, the New Economics Foundation said it was "100 Months to Save the World."
ALL of those dire deadlines to save the planet have come and gone and we are still here. All that scaremongering that human life would be "obliterated" was just so much hot air. The "eco woke" have been wrong every single time. But that doesn't stop them from continuing the scare campaign.

The Chicken Little "sky is falling" routine is nothing new for climate hysterics. There's a history there that goes back to 1864:

155 years later and we're still here.

CNN's Sutter ignored Al Gore's declaration of a "planetary emergency" in 2006 in which he repeated again that we had ten years before we reached a “point of no return.” Media dutifully repeated Gore's claim and ran stories about the end of life as we now it. Fake news before Trump coined the term.

Over and over, the same pattern, act now or doom is certain. These people haven't been right once. What they can't seem to accept is that the fundamental claim that manmade CO2 is destroying the planet has been proven false by 30 years of the most intense scientific observations. The theory is wrong and no amount of carbon tax will have any significant impact on climate change. Warming, such as it is over the last 40 years, shows nothing like the trend these scaremongers insist is just days away.
Even this 0.0 point is an arbitrary construct.  We only have 40 years of data for earth's climate that is billions of years in the making. 
Meanwhile, Al Gore, who had a net worth of less than $2 million as a public official is now worth over $200 million.  He's wrong about EVERYTHING and laughing all the way to the bank at YOUR expense!

Thursday, April 18, 2019

Attorney General Barr's News Conference on Mueller Report: Trump Innocent Until PROVEN Guilty!

I wonder if Dems still trying to convict Trump would like that same standard of justice applied to them?

So, another giant nothingburger for Trump haters with the release of the Mueller report.  In it's entirety, minus redactions for classified or grad jury testimony we confirm what we already knew: no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia and no case to answer for obstructing justice for a crime that never occurred.

That hasn't stopped the Democrat smear machine. The same bunch who have spent the last two years lying and manufacturing FAKE NEWS about Trump seized on every sentence with an effort to spin the story.  Do they think the American people are that stupid?  Well, their voters might be.

Here is the news conference with Attorney General Barr.  Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, whom Democrats previously defended, stands behind:

BARR: Good Morning. Thank you all for being here today.

On March 22, 2019, Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded his investigation of matters related to Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and submitted his confidential report to me pursuant to Department of Justice regulations.

As I said during my Senate confirmation hearing and since, I am committed to ensuring the greatest possible degree of transparency concerning the Special Counsel’s investigation, consistent with the law.

At 11:00 this morning, I will transmit copies of a public version of the Special Counsel’s report to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. The Department of Justice will also make the report available to the American public by posting it on the Department’s website after it has been delivered to Congress.

I would like to offer a few comments today on the report.

But before I do that, I want to thank Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein for joining me here today and for his assistance and counsel throughout this process. Rod has served the Department of Justice for many years with dedication and distinction, and it has been a great privilege and pleasure to work with him since my confirmation. He had well-deserved plans to step back from public service that I interrupted by asking him to help in my transition. Rod has been an invaluable partner, and I am grateful that he was willing to help me and has been able to see the Special Counsel’s investigation to its conclusion. Thank you, Rod.

I would also like to thank Special Counsel Mueller for his service and the thoroughness of his investigation, particularly his work exposing the nature of Russia’s attempts to interfere in our electoral process.

As you know, one of the primary purposes of the Special Counsel’s investigation was to determine whether members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump, or any individuals associated with that campaign, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election. Volume I of the Special Counsel’s report describes the results of that investigation. As you will see, the Special Counsel’s report states that his “investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

I am sure that all Americans share my concerns about the efforts of the Russian government to interfere in our presidential election. As the Special Counsel’s report makes clear, the Russian government sought to interfere in our election. But thanks to the Special Counsel’s thorough investigation, we now know that the Russian operatives who perpetrated these schemes did not have the cooperation of President Trump or the Trump campaign – or the knowing assistance of any other Americans for that matter. That is something that all Americans can and should be grateful to have confirmed.

The Special Counsel’s report outlines two main efforts by the Russian government to influence the 2016 election:

First, the report details efforts by the Internet Research Agency, a Russian company with close ties to the Russian government, to sow social discord among American voters through disinformation and social media operations. Following a thorough investigation of this disinformation campaign, the Special Counsel brought charges in federal court against several Russian nationals and entities for their respective roles in this scheme. Those charges remain pending, and the individual defendants remain at large.

But the Special Counsel found no evidence that any Americans – including anyone associated with the Trump campaign – conspired or coordinated with the Russian government or the IRA in carrying out this illegal scheme. Indeed, as the report states, “[t]he investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly or intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operation.” Put another way, the Special Counsel found no “collusion” by any Americans in the IRA’s illegal activity.

Second, the report details efforts by Russian military officials associated with the GRU to hack into computers and steal documents and emails from individuals affiliated with the Democratic Party and the presidential campaign of Hillary Rodham Clinton for the purpose of eventually publicizing those emails. Obtaining such unauthorized access into computers is a federal crime. Following a thorough investigation of these hacking operations, the Special Counsel brought charges in federal court against several Russian military officers for their respective roles in these illegal hacking activities. Those charges are still pending and the defendants remain at large.

But again, the Special Counsel’s report did not find any evidence that members of the Trump campaign or anyone associated with the campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its hacking operations. In other words, there was no evidence of Trump campaign “collusion” with the Russian government’s hacking.

The Special Counsel’s investigation also examined Russian efforts to publish stolen emails and documents on the internet. The Special Counsel found that, after the GRU disseminated some of the stolen materials through its own controlled entities, DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, the GRU transferred some of the stolen materials to Wikileaks for publication. Wikileaks then made a series of document dumps. The Special Counsel also investigated whether any member or affiliate of the Trump campaign encouraged or otherwise played a role in these dissemination efforts. Under applicable law, publication of these types of materials would not be criminal unless the publisher also participated in the underlying hacking conspiracy. Here too, the Special Counsel’s report did not find that any person associated with the Trump campaign illegally participated in the dissemination of the materials.

Finally, the Special Counsel investigated a number of “links” or “contacts” between Trump Campaign officials and individuals connected with the Russian government during the 2016 presidential campaign. After reviewing those contacts, the Special Counsel did not find any conspiracy to violate U.S. law involving Russia-linked persons and any persons associated with the Trump campaign.

So that is the bottom line. After nearly two years of investigation, thousands of subpoenas, and hundreds of warrants and witness interviews, the Special Counsel confirmed that the Russian government sponsored efforts to illegally interfere with the 2016 presidential election but did not find that the Trump campaign or other Americans colluded in those schemes.

After finding no underlying collusion with Russia, the Special Counsel’s report goes on to consider whether certain actions of the President could amount to obstruction of the Special Counsel’s investigation. As I addressed in my March 24th letter, the Special Counsel did not make a traditional prosecutorial judgment regarding this allegation. Instead, the report recounts ten episodes involving the President and discusses potential legal theories for connecting these actions to elements of an obstruction offense.

After carefully reviewing the facts and legal theories outlined in the report, and in consultation with the Office of Legal Counsel and other Department lawyers, the Deputy Attorney General and I concluded that the evidence developed by the Special Counsel is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

Although the Deputy Attorney General and I disagreed with some of the Special Counsel’s legal theories and felt that some of the episodes examined did not amount to obstruction as a matter of law, we did not rely solely on that in making our decision. Instead, we accepted the Special Counsel’s legal framework for purposes of our analysis and evaluated the evidence as presented by the Special Counsel in reaching our conclusion.

In assessing the President’s actions discussed in the report, it is important to bear in mind the context. President Trump faced an unprecedented situation. As he entered into office, and sought to perform his responsibilities as President, federal agents and prosecutors were scrutinizing his conduct before and after taking office, and the conduct of some of his associates. At the same time, there was relentless speculation in the news media about the President’s personal culpability. Yet, as he said from the beginning, there was in fact no collusion. And as the Special Counsel’s report acknowledges, there is substantial evidence to show that the President was frustrated and angered by a sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks. Nonetheless, the White House fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely, and asserting no privilege claims. And at the same time, the President took no act that in fact deprived the Special Counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation. Apart from whether the acts were obstructive, this evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the President had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation.

Now, before I take questions, I want to address a few aspects of the process for producing the public report that I am releasing today. As I said several times, the report contains limited redactions relating to four categories of information. To ensure as much transparency as possible, these redactions have been clearly labelled and color-coded so that readers can tell which redactions correspond to which categories.

As you will see, most of the redactions were compelled by the need to prevent harm to ongoing matters and to comply with court orders prohibiting the public disclosure of information bearing upon ongoing investigations and criminal cases, such as the IRA case and the Roger Stone case.

These redactions were applied by Department of Justice attorneys working closely together with attorneys from the Special Counsel’s Office, as well as with the intelligence community, and prosecutors who are handling ongoing cases. The redactions are their work product.

Consistent with long-standing Executive Branch practice, the decision whether to assert Executive privilege over any portion of the report rested with the President of the United States. Because the White House voluntarily cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, significant portions of the report contain material over which the President could have asserted privilege. And he would have been well within his rights to do so. Following my March 29th letter, the Office of the White House Counsel requested the opportunity to review the redacted version of the report in order to advise the President on the potential invocation of privilege, which is consistent with long-standing practice. Following that review, the President confirmed that, in the interests of transparency and full disclosure to the American people, he would not assert privilege over the Special Counsel’s report. Accordingly, the public report I am releasing today contains redactions only for the four categories that I previously outlined, and no material has been redacted based on executive privilege.

In addition, earlier this week, the President’s personal counsel requested and were given the opportunity to read a final version of the redacted report before it was publicly released. That request was consistent with the practice followed under the Ethics in Government Act, which permitted individuals named in a report prepared by an Independent Counsel the opportunity to read the report before publication. The President’s personal lawyers were not permitted to make, and did not request, any redactions.

In addition to making the redacted report public, we are also committed to working with Congress to accommodate their legitimate oversight interests with respect to the Special Counsel’s investigation. We have been consulting with Chairman Graham and Chairman Nadler throughout this process, and we will continue to do so.

Given the limited nature of the redactions, I believe that the publicly released report will allow every American to understand the results of the Special Counsel’s investigation. Nevertheless, in an effort to accommodate congressional requests, we will make available to a bipartisan group of leaders from several Congressional committees a version of the report with all redactions removed except those relating to grand-jury information. Thus, these members of Congress will be able to see all of the redacted material for themselves – with the limited exception of that which, by law, cannot be shared.

I believe that this accommodation, together with my upcoming testimony before the Senate and House Judiciary Committees, will satisfy any need Congress has for information regarding the Special Counsel’s investigation.

Once again, I would like to thank you all for being here today. I now have a few minutes for questions.
Mueller investigation by the numbers
Employed 19 lawyers

Worked with team of 40 FBI agents, intelligence analysts, forensic accountants, and other professional staff

Issued more than 2,800 subpoenas

Executed nearly 500 search warrants

Obtained more than 230 orders for communication records

Issued almost 50 orders authorizing use of pen registers

Made 13 requests to foreign governments for evidence

Interviewed approximately 500 witnesses

Mueller Report by on Scribd

Tuesday, April 16, 2019

Miracle at Notre Dame As Damage Not as Total as Feared. Many Artworks Survive

God heard the prayers of the world!

Young Parisians knelt in prayer and sang hymns as the fire raged at Notre Dame on Monday evening. The video is especially touching.
Monday reports from French officials suggested the possibility that the entire cathedral might be destroyed as the fire seemed to rage out of control.  Here's the problem:

The roof of the cathedral was held up with 800 year old beams. As you see from the photo above a fire would rip through the entire area quickly. This is the attic of Notre Dame. Directly below is the ceiling.

The central spire, also made of wood and covered in lead like the roof, collapsed and fell through the ceiling into the center of the cathedral. Fortunately, the central altar with it's priceless works of art was largely saved as were other areas protected by the central columns.

Despite nearby catastrophic damage it appears that some of the larger stained glass rose windows survived. Below is a photo of the north window.

Reports are the the large south window, an incredible work of art installed in 1260 also survived.

Now that the fire is out the urgent need is to assess integrity of the remaining structure

All this is an Easter miracle considering the ferocity of the blaze:

Monday, April 15, 2019

CBS "The Good Fight" Tweets "Assasinate Trump" Image

I wonder why we haven't heard from the Pelosi Censor about this REAL incitement to violence?

Read the top of this list:

How many times now has liberal media sent out such violent images?  I've lost track!

Sunday, April 14, 2019

Pelosi Demands Trump Delete Tweet About Rep. Omar and 9/11 Yet Refuses to Hold Fellow Dems to Same Standard

Dems say far worse about Trump and incite violence yet Pelosi gives them a wink and calls it free speech!

When Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) openly called for Democrats to physically harass Trump Administration officials and their supporters Nancy Pelosi called the incitement "unacceptable." Never once did she demand Rep. Waters take back her words and apologize. When Rep. Ilhan Omar made repeated remarks that were widely viewed as anti-Semitic Pelosi came to her defense saying:
PELOSI: [Rep. Omar] has a different experience in the use of words, doesn’t understand that some of them are fraught with meaning, that she didn’t realize.
A House resolution condemning Omar's remarks was discarded and replaced with one that condemned all hate speech and never mentioned Omar.

Another prime example of Pelosi's twisted logic came when radical freshman Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) called President Trump a "motherfucker" at a gathering of left wing activists Pelosi responded "I'm not in the censorship business."

After Rep. Omar's latest blunder, speaking before a group of radical Muslims where she described the September 11th attacks as "some people did something." President Trump used that quote in a Twitter video with footage from that awful day. Watch the entire video and see what you think.

The video concluded "September 11, 2001 we remember" and Trump added "we will never forget."

But Speaker Pelosi who says she is not in the "censorship business" is demanding that Trump "take down" the "dangerous video" as it might incite violence towards Rep. Omar. Does Pelosi not remember 9/11? Has she forgotten just as she has apparently forgotten all the threats made to Trump supporters? She calls it a "dangerous video." How exactly?
So, it's "dangerous" now to remember the 9/11 attacks? We know whose side Ilhan Omar is on. She laughs about Al Queda and Hezbollah. Whose side is Pelosi on?

Whose side are YOU on?

Saturday, April 13, 2019

More Dem Hypocrisy: They Say They Support Illegals But They Object When Trump Offers to Send Them to Their States

Dems want open borders but just not for their states and cities!

No, it didn't make Dems happy. They rushed to the nearest microphone to call Trump a racist for offering to share the bounty of illegals that Dems demand with sanctuary cities. There is no room at border facilities for the waves of MILLIONS of illegals who have crossed the border in the last few years. They have to go somewhere. But Dems don't want them coming to THEIR cities!

The same Democrats who refuse to agree to effective border security measures called Trump's plan "reprehensible" and "asinine." It's abundantly clear that Dems who welcome illegals with open arms to the country don't want them living in their towns and cities!

Trump should proceed with this plan with all speed. A tent city of illegals outside Speaker Pelosi's walled mansion in San Francisco would hardly be noticed with all the human feces and drug needles already on the sidewalk!

Cher says NO to more illegals in LA

Thursday, April 11, 2019

Rep. Omar: 9/11 "Some People Did Something" Shows How Pro-Islam Left Trivializes Terrorism

Coming from the Jew hating Somali refugee who married her brother and used campaign funds illegally to pay for the divorce!
What a shame Trump's ban on Somali refugees wasn't in place when this America hater was trying to get in!

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

Attorney General Barr Senate Testimony: Obama Administration DID Spy on Trump Campaign

Barr is taking steps to determine whether surveillance was legal!

Remember all the left wing media laughter when Trump revealed that he had been spied on?  The usual suspects said this was evidence Trump was crazy and supported the idea that he should be removed from office.  There were direct and repeated denials that any spying had taken place. (1,2)

But as Winston Churchill famously said: "a lie gets half way around the world before the truth has a chance to put its pants on."  Finally, the truth has its pants on.  There was spying on the Trump campaign.

Attorney General William Barr testified Wednesday before a Senate committee. Watch this:
ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL BARR: As I said in my confirmation hearing, I am going to be reviewing both the genesis and the conduct of intelligence activities directed at the Trump campaign during 2016. And a lot of this has already been investigated, and a substantial portion of it has been investigated and is being investigated by the office of the Inspector General, but one of the things I want to do is pull everything together from the various investigations that have gone on, including on the Hill and in the [Justice] Department, and see if there are any remaining questions to be addressed.

SEN. JEANNE SHAHEEN: And can you share with us why you feel a need to do that?

BARR: Well, you know, for the same reason we're worried about foreign influence in elections, we want to make sure that during elections -- I think spying on a political campaign is a big deal. It's a big deal.

The generation I grew up in, which is the Vietnam War period, people were all concerned about spying on anti-war people and so forth by the government, and there were a lot of rules put in place to make sure that there's an adequate basis before our law enforcement agencies get involved in political surveillance. I'm not suggesting that those rules were violated but I think it's important to look at that. and I'm not talking about the FBI necessarily, but intelligence agencies more broadly.

SHAHEEN: So you're not suggesting, though, that spying occurred?

BARR: Well, I guess -- I think spying did occur, yes. I think spying did occur.

SHAHEEN: Well --

BARR: The question was whether it was adequately predicated. And I'm not suggesting it wasn't adequately predicated. I need to explore that. I think it's my obligation. Congress is usually very concerned about intelligence agencies and law enforcement agencies staying in their proper lane. I want to make sure that happened. We have a lot of rules about that.

I want to say that I've said I'm reviewing this. I haven't set up a team yet, but I have in mind having some colleagues help me pull all this information together and letting me know whether there are some areas that should be looked at. I also want to make clear. I also want to make clear, this is not launching an investigation of the FBI. Frankly, to the extent there were any issues at the FBI, I do not view it as a problem that's endemic to the FBI.

I think there was probably a failure among a group of leaders there, at the upper echelon. So I don't like to hear attacks about the FBI because I think the FBI is an outstanding organization and I think Chris Wray is a great partner for me. I'm very pleased he's there as the director. If it becomes necessary to look over some former officials' activities, I expect I'll be relying heavily on Chris and work closely with him in looking at that information. But that's what I'm doing. I feel I have an obligation to make sure that government power is not abused. I think that's one of the principal roles of the attorney general.
We've known for months now that the FBI bent over backwards to exonerate Hillary Clinton in her classified email scandal. Newly released documents show discussion of the "the Hillary coverup operation" that assured Hillary would not be charged even though the violations of law in the handling of classified information were clear. Anyone else would have gone to jail.

Was McCarthyite "Russia, Russia, Russia" tactic part of cover-up?

Now that we are about to launch a REAL investigation into what happened here, we might revisit the left wing media's role in trying to protect Hillary and lie about Trump. Now that the Mueller report exonerated Trump in regard to any Trump-Russia collusion, people may want to know why CNN and MSNBC constantly beat that drum despite the fact there was NO EVIDENCE.  CNN mentioned Russia 16,000 times in the past two years. Rachel Maddow at MSNBC might have exceeded that amount all on her own. Look at a recap from just ONE of her shows:

For over two years Democrats and their media allies have engaged in a McCarthyite style campaign to point the false finger of Russian accusations at Trump. Did they do so to protect Hillary and to cover-up the role played by Obama Administration officials in spying on Trump? Will we finally find out what fired FBI lawyer Lisa Page meant when she said Obama "wants to know everything we are doing?

Tuesday, April 09, 2019

In White House Meeting w/ Egyptian President Al-Sisi Trump Repairs Previous Administration Damage to Relations. "Quantum Leap" Forward

Obama preferred radical Muslim Brotherhood that sought to turn Egypt into another Iran!

President Donald Trump welcomes visiting Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi to the White House in Washington, Tuesday, April 9, 2019.
The Obama policy of promoting the Muslim Brotherhood as leaders in Egypt could have ended very badly for Egypt, the Middle East and the United States. Obama bent over backward to drive Egypt's long time President Hosni Mubarak from power and in it's place welcomed the radical Muslim Brotherhood. But the people of Egypt knew better and soon drove the Brotherhood out.  Obama never forgave them, nor President Al-Sisi who took over.

Relations between Egypt and the U.S. hit the ultimate low point after that with Obama refusing to invite Al-Sisi to the White House. A very public slap in the face which Egyptians did not forget.

President Trump has now fully repaired the damage that was done to the relationship with a key Middle East ally. Tuesday's White House visit is just icing on the cake. This visit marks the second visit by Al-Sisi to the White House and the sixth between the two leaders.

You couldn't find a better endorsement of Trump's policy of engagement with Egypt than President Al-Sisi's own words at Tuesday's meeting:
PRESIDENT AL SISI: (As interpreted.) Thank you, Mr. President. Allow me to express my thanks for your kind invitation and for providing me this opportunity to meet and talk about making a quantum leap in the strategic relationship between Egypt and the United States.

Let me emphasize, Mr. President, that the relations have not been better over the years of our bilateral relationship, and that is why I’m extending, Mr. President, to you our thanks, appreciation, and greetings for (inaudible).

All the credit goes to you, Mr. President. Thank you very much for your support on all fronts. This is what we’re seeking to promote our bilateral relations in various fields: political, economic, military, cultural, and others.
Aren't you glad there's an adult in the White House?

Saturday, April 06, 2019

Obama Administration Border Chief: Current Border Crisis "Worst We Have Ever Experienced"

Yet open borders Dems continue to deny there is a crisis!

Testimony before a Senate panel this week by Mark Morgan, Obama Administration Border Chief. In a separate interview he described how the border is "wide open."

Morgan's statement blames Democrats for politicizing the issue and ignoring the facts:
The historical data, current factual-based information, and intelligence clearly outlines the very real border threat and humanitarian crisis we face at our southwest border. The changing trends in illegal crossings and exploitation of our laws have overwhelmed our resources and personnel.

We are experiencing a crisis to the magnitude never experienced in modern times. The solution to this extremely complex crisis, cannot be a partisan issue. Simply put – continued inaction through uncompromising positions will only serve to exacerbate the threat. There is an acute need for legislative action.

As the immigration debate has continued, we have seen the political discourse in this country steadily decline. The divisive rhetoric, often directed at the men and women of law enforcement, may serve some political purpose, but its demoralizing for the personnel being attacked. I’ve seen the use of social media to mischaracterize again and again, the actions of law enforcement personnel to further a political talking point. This type of misinformed and generalized rhetoric is beneath any Congressional member and only serves to further divide the country on the immigration debate. The overwhelming majority of border security personnel do what they do out of a sense of duty – to the nation, it’s laws and citizens. They don’t get fulfillment from their government paycheck but rather from a sense of being a part of something greater than one’s self. I’m respectfully requesting as we continue this debate, we all pause, and remember – words matter. They have greater meaning and impact when the words come from our elected members of Congress – with this power comes immense responsibility.
The increases and demographic changes in illegal crossings are direct responses to our broken legal frame work being exploited by the cartels and migrants. The loopholes in our asylum laws; nonsensical judicial precedent; overwhelmed immigration processes; and lack of detention space, have helped drive what has devolved essentially into an open border policy. Central American families are incentivized and rewarded to come and illegally enter our border because they know
DHS must release them within 20 days by law and they will be allowed to remain in the U.S. indefinitely while awaiting immigration court proceedings. It’s simple – they step one foot on American soil, say the magic words under “credible fear” and within a few days they’re allowed into cities all across the U.S. What should sound additional alarms of concern is that most of the family members either lack proper identifying documentation or effective vetting of what they
produce is impossible, so we know virtually nothing about who we’re letting in! Once in, they are typically never to be heard from again.
And don't fool yourself. The "smart border" option being pushed by Democrats presents fewer physical barriers to illegal crossings which is at the heart of the problem. Yep, open borders!
fsg053d4.txt Free xml sitemap generator