Mark Steyn: Wake Up! It's WAR!

The Spectator.co.uk:

That's why I regretfully have to disagree with the editor of this great publication in his prescription of the current situation which appeared in these pages a week or two back under the headline "Just don't call it war". As you'll have gathered, the boss objects to the language of war, whether cultural or military.... Last week's bombs were placed not by martyrs nor by soldiers, but by criminals.

Sorry, but that's the way to lose. A narrowly focused 'criminal' approach means entrusting the whole business to the state bureaucracy. The obvious problem with that is that it's mostly reactive: blow somewhere up, we'll seal it off, and detectives will investigate it as a crime scene. You could make the approach less reactive by a sustained effort to improve scrutiny of immigration, entitlement to welfare and other matters within the purview of government. But consider those two snippets from the Tuesday papers and then figure out the likelihood of that happening. A 'criminal' approach gives terrorists all the rights of criminals, and between British and European 'human rights' that's quite a bundle. If it's a war, you can take wartime measures -- including withdrawal from the UN Convention on Refugees, repeal of the European Human Rights Act, and a clawback of sovereignty from the EU. But if you fight this thing as a law-enforcement matter, Islamist welfare queens will use all the above to their full extent and continue openly promoting the murder of the Prime Minister, British troops, etc. with impunity.