The sad news is that we are all paying the price for Biden's failure. But the big question is how can the few bitter clingers who still support him continue to do so?
Mike's America
Welcome to Mike's America, a view of news and opinion that has caught my attention. You're welcome to share your thoughts by commenting on posts.
Brandon
Thursday, June 23, 2022
Saturday, June 18, 2022
Bozo Biden Falls Off His Bike as America Crashes and Burns
He's destroying this country!
More at the Daily Mail!
At least it happened in front of a small number of his remaining supporters. They can now see first hand he's not up to the job!
Wednesday, June 08, 2022
Democrats Incite Assasination Attempt Against Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh
Chuck Schumer at a rally outside SCOTUS in 2020:
— America Rising (@AmericaRising) June 8, 2022
“I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price.” pic.twitter.com/16dssoGX9s
It's not just Schumer. EVERY Democrat has been out there enabling and justifying illegal activity, which includes protests outside Justice's homes. There is a FEDERAL LAW which prohibits exactly the activity that Democrats encouraged:"You have released the whirlwind"
— Andrew Wilkow (@WilkowMajority) June 8, 2022
"You will pay the price"
"You wont know what hit you"
-@SenSchumer https://t.co/gtgo8WR7ul
Jen Psaki on Tuesday refused to condemn the mob protests that have converged outside the six conservative Supreme Court justices' homes in the last week. https://t.co/4kB9NGDoYr
— National Review (@NRO) May 11, 2022
Now they are taking it to the next level:
When will the Senate hold hearings to examine Senator Schumer's role in the violence? When will we see his communications with these violent groups? Will those hearings be televised in prime time so every American can see for themselves where the violence is coming from?Major media will downplay or ignore this. | New York pro-life pregnancy center allegedly 'firebombed' by left-wing group, investigation launched https://t.co/VpKDDEfIvr #FoxNews
— Dan Gainor (@dangainor) June 7, 2022
Saturday, May 07, 2022
Friday, when thousands of people stood for hours in pouring rain waiting to hear President Trump in Pennsylvania, Biden only managed to entice several dozen at an inside speech in neighboring Ohio.
— mikesamerica (@mikesamerica) May 7, 2022
Tell me again how Biden won without cheating! https://t.co/8SQeXkcAOx pic.twitter.com/7FsBo9PGAQ
Wednesday, May 04, 2022
How Many Dems Coordinated and Funded Attack on Supreme Court?
Minutes after publication of Supreme Court leak a mob descended on the court. Many had preprinted signs. Who coordinated and funded this assault on the court? When will the investigation begin? Not just the leaker needs to be caught. Subpoena communications from Dems. https://t.co/HISy9KF0BD
— mikesamerica (@mikesamerica) May 4, 2022
Violence by these fascists is spreading across the country. Police are being attacked. When will the investigation begin? When will FBI manhunts arrest the suspects and hold them without trial?After the draft Supreme Court opinion on abortion was leaked, fencing was put up around the Court to protect it. Hundreds of angry pro-abortion activists gathered at the fence & called the Justices “fascist scum.” Video by @njhochman: pic.twitter.com/aKvHGEK1Uk
— Andy NgΓ΄ π³️π (@MrAndyNgo) May 3, 2022
VIDEO THREAD: Last night in Los Angeles, LAPD faced off with a coalition of anti-fascists protesting the Supreme Court draft decision overturning Roe v Wade.
— Ford Fischer (@FordFischer) May 4, 2022
At one point, police attempted an arrest (unclear why) & crowd surrounded them, successfully de-arresting their comrade. pic.twitter.com/AFggzG9ONp
Tuesday, May 03, 2022
Prosecutor Ready to Unmask Dem's Trump Russia Disinformation
Will the media that breathlessly reported these lies and the Trump haters who swallowed them whole now be held accountable for their disinformation?
From John Solomon's Just the News:
Durham unmasks alliance between media, Democrat dirt diggers that triggered false Russia story
Court filings show plan to introduce evidence that Clinton campaign flooded media with "unverified derogatory information" on Trump.
Just days after Hillary Clinton emissaries Christopher Steele and Michael Sussmann approached the FBI in September 2016 with dirt that would infuse the Russia collusion probe, the campaign's opposition research firm sent some of the same information to New York Times journalists.
"Gents good to see you yesterday," a Fusion GPS executive wrote the reporters. "Sounded like you might be interested in some of the attached russia-related material. these are internal, open source research drafts, as agreed, pls treat this as background/not for attribution. as you'll see it's all easily replicated anyway."
The invitation to further dirty up Donald Trump continued: "Can also send you a [name]/Toronto memo once i dig it out. I'm skipping over [name] and [company name]. believe your guys have done that up ... leave it to you to distribute internally, or not, as you see fit. don't believe sunny isles/hollywood or panama or toronto have been touched by brands xy or z. amazingly, don't think anyone has done up the trump tower poker ring story either. pretty vivid color there."
The missive is one of hundreds of emails that Special Counsel John Durham has obtained between Clinton campaign operatives and journalists that spread "unverified derogatory information" about Donald Trump, spawning the false Russia collusion narrative shortly before Election Day 2016. They've now been made public in court filings.
Durham recently disclosed several communications with reporters in a filing designed to reject the Clinton campaign's claim that its Steele dossier and other research should be shielded from public view at an upcoming trial because it was covered by attorney client privilege.
Durham's argument is straightforward: Attorney-client privilege doesn't apply to materials the campaign distributed widely to third parties.
But his filing also puts the traditional media on notice that when Sussmann's trial on a charge of lying to the FBI begins next month, the unholy alliance between traditional media reporters and the Democrat machine will be laid bare for the world to see.
And it is clear prosecutors have a clear theory that much of the information spread and then reported by the news media was glaringly weak if not outright false. Durham's filings refer to the Clinton opposition research alternately as a "red herring," "unverified" "too obvious" to be true, or containing a "very weak link." In some cases, those were words used by the very researchers helping assemble the materials.
Yet the traditional media reported it and re-reported it for nearly two years before Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded there was no evidence of a Trump-Russia conspiracy to hijack the 2016 election.
"One of the famous fake news outlets likes to say, 'Democracy dies in darkness.' They're exactly right," former Rep. Devin Nunes, the Republican House Intelligence Committee chairman who helped uravel the Russia collusion narrative, told Just the News. "They're the ones who have created the darkness, and democracy does die. It just happens to be the fake news media that's actually creating this."

Kash Patel, Nunes' former chief counsel on the committee, said traditional news media outlets are ignoring or downplaying much of the bombshell revelations in Durham's filings because "the mainstream media, the fake news media, cannot stand how right we were and how wrong they are."
Whatever the coverage, Durham's filings make abundantly clear the Clinton campaign used the media to spread uncorroborated Russia allegations to dirty up Trump at the same time its emissaries were trying to get the FBI, the CIA and the State Department to investigate the same dirt.
The Clinton campaign and its opposition research team "triggered a sizeable outflow of unverified derogatory information into the media, the government, and the public," Durham wrote in one filing.
In another he added: "The documents produced by Fusion GPS to date reflect hundreds of emails in which Fusion GPS employees shared raw, unverified, and uncorroborated information — including their own draft research and work product — with reporters. And they appear to have done so as part of a (largely successful) effort to trigger negative news stories about" Trump.
Durham said the flooding of the news media was so egregious that it obliterated any claim by the Clinton campaign that Fusion's work was attorney-client privileged work designed to advise on libel issues.
"One would expect contemporaneous emails and documents to reflect that Fusion GPS and/or its clients exercised some degree of caution and care before publicizing unverified or potentially inflammatory materials," but they did not, Durham noted.
The most recent Durham filing lays out several contacts Fusion GPS and the Clinton team had with news media, including The New York Times, ABC News and Slate magazine.
The first media contact noted by Durham dates to May 2016, well before the Steele dossier was crafted or the FBI contacted.
"On May 14, 2016, a Fusion GPS employee emailed a Slate reporter who would publish an article about the Russian Bank-1 allegations several months later," the court fling noted. "In the exchange and subsequent emails, the employee shared portions of research that Fusion GPS was conducting regarding a Trump advisor."
By July, the campaign research team expanded its contacts, including to the Wall Street Journal, to which it "conveyed information Fusion GPS had gathered regarding, among other things, Trump Advisor-1, Russian Bank-1, and a purported board member of Russian Bank-1 who later would appear in the Fusion GPS white paper that the defendant provided to the FBI."
Some of Durham's newly released information shows how the Clinton campaign pointed reporters to elected officials who would confirm or react to the Russia information.
For instance, the prosecutor noted that a Fusion GPS executive urged a reporter at the Wall Street Journal to "call [a named U.S. Representative] or [a named U.S. Senator]," stating, "I bet they are concerned about what [Trump Advisor-1] was doing other than giving a speech over 3 days in Moscow."
Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, told Just the News on Friday that Durham is showing just how closely the media, the Democratic establishment and some rogue elements in U.S intelligence worked together to perpetrate the false Russia story in 2016 — a pattern he said was repeated when the same forces falsely portrayed the Hunter Biden laptop as disinformation in 2020.
When Will Biden's "Disinformation" Czar Correct Dem's Lies?
Biden’s ‘Mary Poppins of Disinformation’ the perfect nanny to tidy up mess of free speech?
“You can just call me the Mary Poppins of disinformation.” That Twitter intro to a TikTok parody of the song “Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious” is now indelibly connected to Nina Jankowicz, the new head of the federal government’s announced Disinformation Governance Board.
Given her record of spreading disinformation and advocating censorship, Jankowicz hardly needed the musical-inspired persona. Yet, for the Biden administration, Jankowicz — like Mary Poppins — is “practically perfect in every way” to keep track of whether we all “measure up” in our public statements.
It is still unclear from the administration’s public statements what authority the board will wield, but White House press secretary Jen Psaki described the board as intended “to prevent disinformation and misinformation from traveling around the country in a range of communities.”
President Biden already has established himself as arguably the most anti-free speech president since John Adams. During his transition period, Biden appointed outspoken advocates for censorship; as president, he has pushed social media companies to expand censorship, while his administration has been criticized for spying on journalists.
Now, with Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter and his pledge to restore free speech values to the platform, panic has set in among Democrats — including Jankowicz, who told National Public Radio, “I shudder to think about if free speech absolutists were taking over more platforms, what that would look like for the marginalized communities.”
Jankowicz’s singing voice may be impressive, but her appointment is tone-deaf.
She has been ridiculed for pushing the false “Russian disinformation” claim about the original reporting on Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop, stressing that “we should view it as a Trump campaign product.” She continued to spread that disinformation, including tweeting a link to a news article that she said cast “yet more doubt on the provenance of the NY Post’s Hunter Biden story.” In another related tweet, she added that “emails don’t need to be altered to be part of an influence campaign. Voters deserve that context, not a [fairy] tale about a laptop repair shop.” Conversely, she cited Christopher Steele, author of the discredited “Steele dossier” during the 2016 presidential campaign, as a source on how to stop disinformation.
An even more tone-deaf figure may be Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, who appointed Jankowicz to her new role. Mayorkas seemingly follows that other Mary Poppins command — “I would like to make one thing clear: I never explain anything” — as he and President Biden have maintained one of the most disgraceful examples of disinformation: the accusation that U.S. border agents whipped migrants in Texas.
The whipping story is a chilling example of real disinformation that can be devastating for individuals and destructive in politics. The story of white officers whipping Haitian migrants at the southern border was utterly irresistible and eagerly embraced by many media and political figures. It was based largely on a misleading photograph of a mounted border officer, despite an available video that clearly refuted the whipping claim. Even the image’s photographer stated at the time that the story was false and “nobody saw a Border Patrol agent whipping” anyone.
Still, many in the media went into a familiar feeding frenzy, encouraged by key political figures. Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) declared that the alleged whipping was just the latest example of “white supremacist behavior.” Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) said the incident was “worse than what we witnessed in slavery” and decried that “the cowboys who were running down Haitians and using their reins to whip them.” Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) condemned the purported “inhumane treatment of Haitian migrants by Border Patrol — including the use of whips.”
The verdict was in, and President Biden went on every network to announce it at the start of the investigation. He expressed disgust over watching what he termed the “horrible … outrageous” actions of the agents as they “strapped” migrants, and he declared, “I promise you, those people will pay.”
For his part, Mayorkas — the official tasked with investigating the allegation — said that the alleged conduct of the agents “correctly and necessarily were met with our nation’s horror.” He then promised that his department would complete the investigation “with tremendous speed and with tremendous force … thoroughly, but very quickly. It will be completed in days, not weeks.”
That was more than six months ago.
As early declarations of Biden and others quickly fell apart, the White House went into uncharacteristic silence. The promised speedy investigation mysteriously dragged on. The facts supporting or disproving the whipping allegation were evident within 24 hours — but a finding that the agents never whipped any migrants would be embarrassing to Mayorkas and the president. Accordingly, rather than announcing a finding in a matter of days, the agents continue in limbo.
This month, it has been reported that the agents were cleared of criminal assault. Yet the White House has refused to apologize, and Mayorkas has refused to publicly state that the agents were cleared.
Instead, the White House’s Psaki was confronted recently by Ebony McMorris, of American Urban Radio Networks, who asked for the president’s response to the lack of punishment for “patrol agents that were seen whipping Haitian migrants.” Keep in mind there is no video showing agents whipping Haitians but, instead, a video showing the contrary. Yet some in the media are still demanding punishment, and the White House refuses to alter its original condemnation.
What would the Mary Poppins of Disinformation call that?
As Jankowicz sang in her video:
“Information laundering is really quite ferocious.
“It’s when a huckster takes some lies and makes them sound precocious.
“By saying them in Congress or a mainstream outlet so
“Disinformation’s origins are slightly less atrocious.”
The new Disinformation Governance Board head may have a theme song, but Jankowicz may be quickly losing her credibility. Psaki first admitted she didn’t know who Jankowicz was — and then the following day offered a tepid defense that she was someone with an extensive background, including testimony in both the British Parliament and Congress. (She failed to mention Jankowicz was advocating public and private censorship.) Psaki then stressed twice that Jankowicz was selected by Mayorkas and Homeland Security.
For his part, Mayorkas said he was unaware of the past positions and statements of an appointee he had just praised as uniquely qualified.
In Washington speak, that’s a signal that “wind’s in the east, mist comin’ in” — and it may be time for her to umbrella out of here.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. Follow him on Twitter @JonathanTurley.
Tuesday, April 26, 2022
Twitter Meltdown as Dems Reveal Control of Social Media to Influence Elections
Why is it that irony is so difficult for these lefties to understand? Twitter, Facebook and Google did everything they could to censor conservative speech and boost Democrat voices. And they did it exactly to influence the presidential election. Biden's mess is on their hands! https://t.co/B0rMpjfpTN
— mikesamerica (@mikesamerica) April 27, 2022
Sunday, April 24, 2022
Massive Crowd for Trump in Ohio. Only a Handful for Biden in New Hampshire
Biden went to New Hampshire last week. There were almost as many protesters outside as Biden fans inside:INCREDIBLE crowd welcomes President Trump to Ohio! pic.twitter.com/CLT0iFWrHV
— RSBN πΊπΈ (@RSBNetwork) April 23, 2022
Tell me again how Biden got more votes than Trump?The Most Popular President in US History Speaks to Paltry Crowd in New Hampshire (VIDEO) https://t.co/sn8KRUQiIR #US #Uncategorized #World
— Watchman.Today π (@StaffEditorial) April 19, 2022
Wednesday, April 13, 2022
New Polls Continue to Show Biden Cratering. Voters Blame DEMOCRATS for the Mess!
Joe Biden has a 33% approval rating according to the latest Quinnipiac poll. That’s awful. But the ethnic group with the lowest approval rating for him? Hispanics at 26%. Wow. His approval rating for 18-34 year old voters is 21%, lowest of any age group. (Pic via @GiancarloSopo) pic.twitter.com/7DRuv3UDyA
— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) April 13, 2022
Biden's approval among 18-to-34-year-olds is literally lower than Trump's was, in the same Quinnipiac poll in March 2018! Hard to overstate what a shocking failure this is for a Democratic administration. pic.twitter.com/GbiTlyJgsZ
— Will Stancil (@whstancil) April 13, 2022
Do you Approve or Disapprove of the Job President Biden is doing? (Quinnipiac Poll)
— InteractivePolls (@IAPolls2022) April 13, 2022
OVERALL: 33/54
Dems: 76/12
GOP: 3/94
Indie: 26/56 (-30)
Men: 29/59
Women: 37/50
White College: 52/42
White no College: 20/67
18-34: 21/58
White: 31/59
Black: 63/25
Hispanic: 26/54 (-28)
…and President Biden continues to get low marks on handling them. pic.twitter.com/GBLjBFbgqv
— CBS News Poll (@CBSNewsPoll) April 10, 2022
Americans are basing this on personal experience: two-thirds say higher prices have been difficult or even a hardship, and now forcing many to make cutbacks. https://t.co/9OaOOQIMlX pic.twitter.com/BptFZse7gh
— CBS News Poll (@CBSNewsPoll) April 10, 2022
Biden and the Democrats are toast. In a fair election they will lose in record numbers. Will it be a fair election or will they cheat AGAIN?MORE: Americans are more likely to place a "great deal" or a "good amount" of blame for gas price increases on Democratic Party policies (52%) and Pres. Biden (51%) than on Republican Party policies (33%) and former Pres. Trump (24%). https://t.co/P97MBrj2je
— ABC News (@ABC) April 10, 2022