Not content with destroying monuments to Confederate soldiers left wing fascists demanded that a marker for Confederate dead in a California cemetery called Hollywood Forever be removed.
Threats of violence and vandalism, typical of the hate filled left, were made if the marker was not removed. No word on when they will demand destruction of the corpses.
Once again, a small, violent minority is demanding that their voice be heard or else!
Meanwhile, a poll by National Public Radio shows that most Americans do NOT support the destruction of monuments and symbols of American history:
But this small minority of violent, left wing fascists do NOT respect the views of the majority of Americans. Like the Taliban and ISIS who are famous for erasing history they find objectionable, the left resorts to violence if their radical demands are not met.
At some point future Americans may erect monuments to memorialize the brave heroes who stood up to this vile left wing fascist minority. Statues of Trump will be in big demand!
Left wing fascists are now not only emboldened but encouraged!
A left wing commenter at this blog has said it. If there is an individual or group of people that someone on the left finds disagreeable then they are entitled, even encouraged to take violent action towards that person or group.
It's happening across the country. Whether it's on a college campus where rioters shut down free speech or earlier this year in Alexandria where a left wing extremist Trump hater tried to assassinate GOP members of Congress at baseball practice. The level of violence and hate has spread. But when Trump points that out he is assailed by the mainstream media which appears to be enabling much of the left wing hate.
Now this:
The face of hate. Karl Smith. Armed with gun and pepper spray
The attack occurred during a parade in the small town of Newton, North Carolina at which military units participated along with Civil War re-enactors. Smith, from a nearby town, pepper sprayed the re-enactors.
So now you have it. If you belong to the extreme left you are entitled to take violent action towards any person or group you find offensive. Whether it's a peaceful parade, Klan rally, college speech or GOP members of Congress. The wave of left wing fascist violence will continue to grow until the mainstream media recognizes that Trump was right. There is hate and violence on BOTH SIDES! We saw it in action again in the small town of Newton on Thursday.
The left wing fascist movement may have started in Berkeley, California but it's now spread nationwide. Even to small towns.
Here's the face of left wing fascism in Durham North Carolina. No white supremacists or neo-Nazis anywhere in sight but this left wing mob decided THEY, not the citizens of the town had the right to remove historic statues.
Chanting: "No KKK. No fascist USA," these extremists, historical terrorist don't seem to understand the irony that THEY ARE THE FASCISTS!
Meanwhile, in Chicago a statue of Abraham Lincoln is set on fire and in Washington, DC the Lincoln Memorial was vandalized. Do they fools not know Lincoln freed the slaves? Calls are to remove the Jefferson Memorial and to strike George Washington from the name of public spaces.
It's obvious these people want to erase history and then what? Put up statues of Che Guevara to take their place? I hear the Republics of the former Soviet Union keep a surplus of statues of Lenin. This rabid mob might like a few of those!
This is where the left wing mob mentality has led us. It's been enabled by the media that can only see one side and damnation to any reporter who dares to report otherwise. Somehow they will blame Trump for it! Where is this going to stop?
It's a short step to go from destroying monuments above to destroying speech. And the irony is that the people claiming to be anti-fascists are the bookburners!
The same spirit that inspired Nazis to burn books is alive today on the far left!
But of course protesters today want to revise that bit of history and forget the REAL past! While left wing fascists are busy pulling down monuments faster than the Taliban they might want to get rid of the Democrat Party which is the historical home of slavery, the KKK and Jim Crow. Rush Limbaugh had the idea and I'm happy to expand on it!
Consider this:
End racism and hate by aborting the Democrat Party!
Once again, fake news is determined to excuse left wing hate which is the reason why violence occurred in the first place!
If you watched the live reporting from Charlottesville, Virginia on Saturday you saw gangs of thugs from Black Lies Matter armed with baseball bats and weapons rushing toward those who had a permit to protest the removal of the statue of Robert E. Lee.
Reporters who were on the scene also observed and reported the same. But now, they're being bullied and pressured to report only half the truth. That's why we call it FAKE NEWS!
Here's an example:
2. The hard left seemed as hate-filled as alt-right. I saw club-wielding "antifa" beating white nationalists being led out of the park 2/2
Imagine the outcry if Trump met with white supremacists!
In the wake of the Charlottesville riot the media demanded that the Trump Administration label the incident as "domestic terrorism." Funny, but the same media types looked the other way as the Obama Administration refused to label the Fort Hood attack as terrorism or the killing of five police officers in Dallas by a Black Lives Matter activist. Obama meet with leaders of Black Lies Matter at the White House and in the wake of the Dallas assassination continued to call protests by BLM "a good thing."
Now, elements of this fringe hate group were central in inciting violence in Charlottesville.
Here's a reminder of the recent past. Might it have any bearing on where we are today with race relations and the leaders of the Democrat Party responsible for the mess?
DAILY CALLER: In light of the criticism against the current president, it’s worth remembering how the previous president dealt with an act of domestic terror committed by a racial nationalist.
In July of 2016, an avowed black nationalist murdered five police officers during a Black Lives Matter demonstration in Dallas, Texas. The act of violence was well-planned and was motivated entirely by the hate-filled ideology of the shooter, Micah Xavier Johnson.
With several officers dead by the hand of a committed black nationalist, one might think the Obama administration may have considered the assassinations domestic terror and launched an investigation into groups associated with this ideology.
Not at all.
Barack Obama condemned the shootings, but he did not call out or even allude to Johnson’s hateful views. He did, however, blame “powerful weapons” for the violence.
In her statement on the shooting, then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch exploited the tragedy to push for gun control and praise the cause of Black Lives Matter. No mention of Johnson’s ideology or “hate” in was made in her statement, but she did manage to directly name multiple cases of police-involved shootings — all after cops were the ones murdered.
Cop killing has been a frequent occurrence in the wake of the Black Lies Matter movement and yet at every step the Obama Administration refused to call the assassinations acts of terror and instead accused police of creating the environment where such acts occurred.
We're living now with the consequence of years of Obama promoting black nationalists, even looking the other way as violence escalates so Obama and the Democrats could use heightened racial tensions to whip up support in the black community that and the left wing news media. It's one more case of Trump being forced to clean up the mess Obama left behind!
This whole race war is a set up by Black Lives Matter and the left! Just about every Republican on the planet condemned the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia yesterday. But Democrats went out of their way to condemn Trump for condemning ALL violence.
It seems Democrats only want to condemn white nationalists. And why not? They're repulsive. But in case you had not noticed, we hardly ever heard from the so-called white nationalists until the Black Lives Matter crowd started calling for white cops, or white people in general to be killed. And we saw so many acts of violence directed at the right across the country that had nothing to do with any alt-right group. Look at the riots in Berkeley or other college campuses if you need a refresher. How about the "black only" spaces springing up at enlightened universities?
Watching the news footage yesterday I saw repeated images of Black Lies Matter and other black clad anarchist types carrying baseball bats and assaulting alt-right protesters.
Have we reached the point in this country where only certain groups like Black Lives Matter have the right to be heard in the public space? Sorry folks, but THAT IS the definition of fascism which ironically these dolts claim to be protesting! If you need some perspective, you might ask former presidential candidate Bernie Sanders how he felt after being forced off the stage at one of his own events after Black Lies Matter seized the microphone.
There is NO DIFFERENCE between the repulsive speech of white nationalists and black nationalists. They are BOTH HATE GROUPS. Yet the Democrats continue to embrace Black Lives Matter while calling on Republicans to denounce white nationalists which THEY DO!
Don't think this is all being staged by Black Lies Matter and the Dems?
Here's Obama meeting with Black Lies Matter activists at the White House and being embraced by black civil rights leaders. How many friends of these folks were carrying bats in Charlottesville on Saturday?
Obama embraced Black Lives Matter activists at the White House. How many went on
to riot in Charlottesville and elsewhere?
And it's not like we should be surprised that they were going to start trouble. They announced it in advance. Thousands of tweets, many much more hate filled than this one could fill the pages of this blog for days:
Bernie Sanders got booed for saying "all lives matter." Trump is being criticized for saying violence from all sides has to stop. It seems Democrats are just fine with violence by Black Lies Matter and the incitement to violence they provide all across the country.
Stop white nationalist hate. Stop black nationalist hate. Is that so difficult to understand? If you can't do that then the violence will continue as one side seems to have a get out of jail free card! UPDATE:
What happened in Charlottesville was no accident. Black Lies Matter went there to incite violence! Again, no Dems have denounced the group.
One of our photographers was hit with a stick in the back of the head by a protestor for shooting video of protest with his phone. @CBS6pic.twitter.com/vnuJ12KfLQ
Focus on diplomacy without result has led to current situation!
Give peace a chance! That's the message coming from Democrats and the foreign policy establishment worldwide. I might as well listen to the John Lennon tune. Even as a comatose 22 year old Otto Warmbier was returned to the U.S. to die after being beaten in a North Korean prison the peace at any price crowd wanted talk, talk and more talk. That's been the ONLY U.S. response to North Korea for over 25 years. During that time North Korea went from a nuclear free country to one during the Obama Administration armed with 60 miniaturized warheads and well on their way to developing a missile capable of delivering them.
No matter how much talk there has been the situation only gets worse. Diplomacy has failed. I recommend reading the Arms Control Association timeline on North Korea for a brief history of the effort.
The short version is this: In 1991 President George H. W. Bush ordered the removal of all U.S. nuclear weapons from South Korea. Shortly after that both North and South Korea agreed to declare the Korean Peninsula a nuclear free zone banning all weapons development. The North Koreans started cheating right away.
During the early 1990's North Korea continued to cheat on nuclear agreements and deny required inspections. Then former President Jimmy Carter got into the act and produced an agreement with North Korea in 1994. Here's President Clinton announcing the agreement in October 1994:
CLINTON: Before I take your questions, I'd like to say just a word about the framework with North Korea that Ambassador Gallucci signed this morning.
This is a good deal for the United States. North Korea will freeze and then dismantle its nuclear program. South Korea and our other allies will be better protected. The entire world will be safer as we slow the spread of nuclear weapons.
South Korea, with support from Japan and other nations, will bear most of the cost of providing North Korea with fuel to make up for the nuclear energy it is losing, and they will pay for an alternative power system for North Korea that will allow them to produce electricity while making it much harder for them to produce nuclear weapons.
The United States and international inspectors will carefully monitor North Korea to make sure it keeps its commitments. Only as it does so will North Korea fully join the community of nations."
Sounds great hunh? North Korea laughed all the way to the bank and the cheating never stopped!
George W. Bush initially followed a harder line. Bush stopped aid and refused direct talks while describing North Korea as part of an "axis of evil" in the 2002 State of the Union speech. But the do-gooders in Colin Powell's State Department eventually wore Bush down and once again North Korea laughed all the way to the bank.
When Obama, Mr. Red Line in Syria, came into office the North Koreans KNEW they had a good thing. North Korea began testing nuclear weapons while Obama sent high level envoys for diplomatic talks and promised aid if the North Koreans stopped. There was an agreement in 2012 that North Korea would stop nuclear development in return for U.S. aid. The North Koreans laughed all the way to the bank.
Two years later Obama, Mr. Red Line, was in South Korea blustering about U.S. military might. He said The U.S. "will not hesitate to use our military might." North Korea laughed it off! I can't recall any of the melting snowflakes currently hyperventilating about Trump's threat to North Korea fainting in fear at that. No wonder!
Meanwhile, Obama cut spending for missile defense and canceled basing agreements with other nations.
Obama proved so feckless in achieving a deal with North Korea but that didn't stop him from shouting to the rooftops after the deal he cut with Iran. Contrast his words with the failed policy of Bill Clinton above:
OBAMA: Iran will not get its hands on a nuclear bomb. The region, the United States, and the world will be more secure.
It's clear that appeasement and diplomacy has failed. And because of that failure, the threat is now much greater than it ever was. The cost of containing it is also higher. Time to try something new. Let's hope Trump doesn't get snookered like Clinton and Obama!
Is there anyone who doesn't think that North Korean threats to attack the United States with nuclear weapons wouldn't require an all out response from the U.S.? Flatten them!
The only reason we are in this mess is because of the appeasement offered by Obama and Bill Clinton!
Trump knows that if he succeeds in getting the economy moving it means he wins the political war!
None of the Hate Trump media will follow this, but to those of us who pay attention to larger questions than the sideshow offered by the Democrats Daily Plan to Destroy Trump (bought and paid for by a foreign agent who once collaborated with the Nazis), Trump's leadership is already paying off for ALL Americans. Not just the rich who got richer under Obama while the Middle Class shrunk.
Gary Shapiro writing at Business Daily elaborates on the talking points below:
Dems got their demand for a prosecutor to investigate Trump despite lack of evidence to suggest wrongdoing. There IS EVIDENCE of Dem wrongdoing in run up to 2016 election. Time for another Special Prosecutor!
The Obama Administration clearly learned a key lesson from the Clinton era: never appoint a Special Prosecutor. You never know what that will lead to.
So, during the Obama Administration they largely stonewalled requests from Congress for oversight on the various Obama scandals. Be it the IRS targeting of the Tea Party, Fast and Furious gun running, illegal monitoring of reporters and an Attorney General held in contempt for lying to Congress. With media help, Obama stonewalled it all.
Funny how Democrats in Congress who deflected every call for a Special Prosecutor during the Obama years were the first to demand one to investigate Trump. And shame on Trump and the Department of Justice for allowing the appointment of Mueller.
But if you're going to have Mueller digging for dirt all the way back to Donald Trump Jr.'s paper route then why are we still ignoring complaints about possible criminal activity by Democrats during the Obama years?
Last week Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee sent a letter to Attorney General Sessions in which they said:
As we referenced above, Democrats and the mainstream media called for a special counsel to be appointed to investigate any Russian influence on President Trump’s campaign. Their pleas were answered, but there are many questions that may be outside the scope of Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation. This was clear following Mr. Comey’s recent testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee on June 8, 2017, which ignited renewed scrutiny of former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and the actions she took to mislead the public concerning the investigation into the Clinton email investigation. Last year, this Committee inquired repeatedly about the circumstances surrounding that and other matters, but our inquiries were largely ignored.
Here are the questions which House Republican Judiciary members want a Special Prosecutor to address:
We call on a newly appointed special counsel to investigate, consistent with appropriate regulations, the following questions, many of which were previously posed by this Committee and remain unanswered:
1.Then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch directing Mr. Comey to mislead the American people on the nature of the Clinton investigation;
2. The shadow cast over our system of justice concerning Secretary Clinton and her involvement in mishandling classified information;
3. FBI and DOJ’s investigative decisions related to former Secretary Clinton’s email investigation, including the propriety and consequence of immunity deals given to potential Clinton co-conspirators Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, John Bentel and possibly others;
4. The apparent failure of DOJ to empanel a grand jury to investigate allegations of mishandling of classified information by Hillary Clinton and her associates;
5. The Department of State and its employees’ involvement in determining which communications of Secretary Clinton’s and her associates to turn over for public scrutiny;
6.WikiLeaks disclosures concerning the Clinton Foundation and its potentially unlawful international dealings;
7. Connections between the Clinton campaign, or the Clinton Foundation, and foreign entities, including those from Russia and Ukraine;
8.Mr. Comey’s knowledge of the purchase of Uranium One by the company Rosatom, whether the approval of the sale was connected to any donations made to the Clinton Foundation, and what role Secretary Clinton played in the approval of that sale that had national security ramifications;
9. Disclosures arising from unlawful access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer systems, including inappropriate collusion between the DNC and the Clinton campaign to undermine Senator Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign;
10. Post-election accusations by the President that he was wiretapped by the previous Administration, and whether Mr. Comey and Ms. Lynch had any knowledge of efforts made by any federal agency to unlawfully monitor communications of then-candidate Trump or his associates;
11. Selected leaks of classified information related to the unmasking of U.S. person identities incidentally collected upon by the intelligence community, including an assessment of whether anyone in the Obama Administration, including Mr. Comey, Ms. Lynch, Ms. Susan Rice, Ms. Samantha Power, or others, had any knowledge about the “unmasking” of individuals on then candidate-Trump’s campaign team, transition team, or both;
12. Admitted leaks by Mr. Comey to Columbia University law professor, Daniel Richman, regarding conversations between Mr. Comey and President Trump, how the leaked information was purposefully released to lead to the appointment of a special counsel, and whether any classified information was included in the now infamous “Comey memos”;
13. Mr. Comey’s and the FBI’s apparent reliance on “Fusion GPS” in its investigation of the Trump campaign, including the company’s creation of a “dossier” of information about Mr. Trump, that dossier’s commission and dissemination in the months before and after the 2016 election, whether the FBI paid anyone connected to the dossier, and the intelligence sources of Fusion GPS or any person or company working for Fusion GPS and its affiliates;
14. Any and all potential leaks originated by Mr. Comey and provided to author Michael Schmidt dating back to 1993.
You have the ability now to right the ship for the American people so these investigations may proceed independently and impartially. The American public has a right to know the facts – all of them – surrounding the election and its aftermath. We urge you to appoint a second special counsel to ensure these troubling, unanswered questions are not relegated to the dustbin of history.
