Real America Stands with TRUMP!

Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Will Meryl Streep & Hollywood Establishment Who Cheered Pedophile Roman Polanski Face Same Shunning as Milo Yiannopoulos

Of course not. But if Milo was a left winger, he would be praised for his comments!

Libertarian Bad Boy, Milo Yiannopoulos, is in trouble. His remarks about younger boys and older men having sex went too far for the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) which dis-invited him from speaking after they came to light. Milo's book deal also feel through.

His words were offensive and CPAC took the right action. But consider for a moment what would be the reaction on the left if Milo were one of them.

Roman Polanski, a celebrated director of Hollywood movies was accused of drugging a 13 year old girl in 1977 at the home of actor Jack Nicholson and raping her repeatedly as she begged him to stop. The girl later recounted "I said, 'No, no. I don't want to go in there. No, I don't want to do this. No!"

Apparently, "no" means no if you are a Hollywood liberal!

In 2003 Hollywood awarded Polanski an Oscar. Watch as Meryl Streep, who frets so about Trump and women, gives Polanski a standing ovation along with her other Hollywood friends. Note Streep was seated near Jack Nicholson. Cue the player to the 50 second mark:

Milo Yiannopoulos discussed a hypothetical scenario based on his own experience and is outcast. Roman Polanski actually RAPED a 13 year old girl, fled from prison and is celebrated by the same people who think Trump is a danger to women. If Milo was a lefty he would be getting an award. Just another example of how the right upholds a higher standard and the hypocrisy of left wing phonies!

Sunday, February 19, 2017

Tens of Thousands of Real Americans Show Support for Trump in Florida

But the same media that tout every attack on Trump by the left will forget this image by Monday!

If you missed the speech, it's here. In Melbourne, Florida on Saturday thousands of patriotic Americans inside and an overflow crowd of thousands more outside gathered to hear President Trump and offer their support. But if you watched the dishonest anti-Trump media would you would might not know about that as they were too busy covering the relative handful of protesters.

First Lady Melania Trump introduced her husband after leading the massive crowd in the Lord's Prayer. That as much as anything will drive the godless, or pro-Islamic left crazy!

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

More Smiles as Allies Canada and Israel Make White House Visits

In a week where Democrats are desperate to change the subject to their mudslinging, the real story is the parade of allies happy to see Trump in the White House!

After last weekend's busy trip to Florida with the Japanese Prime Minister President Trump welcomed Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau followed by Israel's Bibi Netanyahu. Photo highlights:

Canada's Justin Trudeau was all smiles. He made a point to show respect despite any differences.

Some on the left are going bonkers over this photo. Apparently they didn't mind when Obama put his feet up
on the desk. Does the left hate powerful women now?

Melania's first White House welcome was reserved for Israel's Bibi Netanyahu.
Netanyahu: "There is no greater supporter of the Jewish people and the Jewish state than President Donald Trump."

The Swamp Strikes Back: Obama Loyalists Still in Government Seek to Undermine Lawful Trump Administration with Illegal Leaks

The left used to worry about civil rights abuses of big government. Now they cheer them!

Remember all the hand wringing those on the left engaged in when discussing powers of the Federal Government to monitor communications of Americans? Apparently that's no longer an issue until the target for abuse is a Democrat and not a Republican.

Behind the scenes, a shadowy group of individuals working for the U.S. government, some in the previous Obama Administration, some still working but with loyalty to Obama appear to have orchestrated a series of leaks undermining the Trump Administration.

It started with the leaks of notes about Trump's phone calls to foreign leaders where it was suggested Trump threatened to send troops to Mexico. Now, it concerns retired General Michael Flynn, forced to resign as National Security Adviser after reports of a conversation with the Russian Ambassador was leaked.

A discussion between Flynn, an American citizen and a part of the Trump transition team should have been protected by law from any unauthorized release. But as we've seen in Seattle where a Judge simply ignores clear law to block Trump's immigration order the left has once again acted outside the law.

Throughout the news cycle Capitol Hill Democrats, joined by useful idiots like Sens. Graham and McCain, insist there must be an investigation into why Flynn had contacts with the Russians in the first place. Answer, it's HIS JOB! Funny how the same people who moaned about the costs of investigations when Hillary Clinton was the subject are now all hepped up for some investigatin.'

They need not bother on that score. In a LONG piece by the New York Times the paper reveals "no evidence" of any collusion between Trump's men and Russia. The real need for an investigation is who has been making these illegal leaks? And we can bet Dems will do everything they can to change the subject when that comes up.

In fact, Dems are so desperate to keep looking for the Russian under the bed that House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Hillary coverup king Rep. Elijah Cummings rushed to the microphones yesterday after a fake Tweet purporting to be from General Flynn suggested he was fired to cover up for others in the Trump Administration. But to Democrats it won't matter if the source of their outrage is fake or not. It's all politics to them.

Here's the real problem. From Eli Lake: "The Political Assassination of Michael Flynn:"
Normally intercepts of U.S. officials and citizens are some of the most tightly held government secrets. This is for good reason. Selectively disclosing details of private conversations monitored by the FBI or NSA gives the permanent state the power to destroy reputations from the cloak of anonymity. This is what police states do.

In the past it was considered scandalous for senior U.S. officials to even request the identities of U.S. officials incidentally monitored by the government (normally they are redacted from intelligence reports). John Bolton's nomination to be U.S. ambassador to the United Nations was derailed in 2006 after the NSA confirmed he had made 10 such requests when he was Undersecretary of State for Arms Control in George W. Bush's first term. The fact that the intercepts of Flynn's conversations with Kislyak appear to have been widely distributed inside the government is a red flag.

Representative Devin Nunes, the Republican chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, told me Monday that he saw the leaks about Flynn's conversations with Kislyak as part of a pattern. "There does appear to be a well orchestrated effort to attack Flynn and others in the administration," he said. "From the leaking of phone calls between the president and foreign leaders to what appears to be high-level FISA Court information, to the leaking of American citizens being denied security clearances, it looks like a pattern."
And another comment by Rep. Nunes:
"If [the Flynn conversation] was picked up inadvertently, then that would have had to have been approved by someone in the last administration to actually unmask his name so that the FBI or intelligence officials knew who it was on the other end of the phone talking to the Russian ambassador," Nunes told Fox News. "If, in fact, the press reports are right, someone made the decision to deliberately listen to General Flynn's phone calls and that is, I think, unprecedented, unwarranted and flat-out wrong."
Obamaites seek to protect Iran agreement

The main beneficiary of Flynn's ouster is Iran. Gen. Flynn was behind a move to make public the secret parts of the Iran deal which Obama refused to release. Those secret agreements may provide further ignominy to an already discredited deal and Obama's tattered legacy. The left will do anything to stop that from happening and former Obama aides are directly involved in an effort to fight Flynn from behind the scenes. In a report by the Free Beacon:
"It's undeniable that the campaign to discredit Flynn was well underway before Inauguration Day, with a very troublesome and politicized series of leaks designed to undermine him," said one veteran national security adviser with close ties to the White House team. "This pattern reminds me of the lead up to the Iran deal, and probably features the same cast of characters."

The Free Beacon first reported in January that, until its final days in office, the Obama administration hosted several pro-Iran voices who were critical in helping to mislead the American public about the terms of the nuclear agreement. This included a former Iranian government official and the head of the National Iranian American Council, or NIAC, which has been accused of serving as Iran's mouthpiece in Washington, D.C.

Since then, top members of the Obama administration's national security team have launched a communications infrastructure after they left the White House, and have told reporters they are using that infrastructure to undermine Trump's foreign policy.

"It's actually Ben Rhodes, NIAC, and the Iranian mullahs who are celebrating today," said one veteran foreign policy insider who is close to Flynn and the White House. "They know that the number one target is Iran … [and] they all knew their little sacred agreement with Iran was going to go off the books. So they got rid of Flynn before any of the [secret] agreements even surfaced."

Flynn had been preparing to publicize many of the details about the nuclear deal that had been intentionally hidden by the Obama administration as part of its effort to garner support for the deal, these sources said.

Flynn is now "gone before anybody can see what happened" with these secret agreements, said the second insider close to Flynn and the White House.
Note, Ben Rhodes was the key player in the Benghazi coverup who forced agencies to claim a video was the cause of the attacks.

In many of these agencies Obama Administration officials either remain in place because Democrats have blocked confirmation of their replacements or they have "burrowed in" to the civil service. There is no doubt that their loyalties lie more with Obama than with Trump.

Democrats have shown that they will go to any lengths for power. Even to the point of criminal behavior and corrupting the most highly secret government organizations to serve that lust for power. Trump must wake up to the reality that a cancer is growing inside the government he seeks to lead and deal with it now!

UPDATE: Hysteria Alert: Trump worse than 9/11 attacks and Pearl Harbor. These people are literally losing their minds!

Sunday, February 12, 2017

Over Weekend Trip and Despite North Korea Missile Launch Trump Affirms Alliance with Japan Strong as Ever!

A reminder once again how Trump is restoring the confidence of our allies!

First official head of state visit to the Trump White House was British Prime Minister Theresa May. Both leaders stood next to the bush of Winston Churchill in the Oval Office which Trump restored after Obama's banishment of that visible symbol of allied unity.

Now, an important visit by one of our nation's strongest allies in the Pacific region. While the Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was the first world leader to meet Trump in New York after he was elected, this visit affirms our strong alliance with a more informal meeting in Florida following official meetings in the White House on Friday.

Arriving in Florida aboard Air Force One. The Japanese Prime Minister arrived in Washington aboard his own 747. Now he can compare the ride to Trump's.

Golf was on the agenda at a Trump golf course:

And dinner at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate:

North Korea attempted to break up the party by firing a missile. So, time out for business as Trump and Abe affirmed allied unity. Trump: "I just want everybody to understand and fully know that the United States of America stands behind Japan, its great ally, 100 per cent."

Along for the ride were Trump's daughter Ivanka and husband Jared, a senior Trump adviser, and their children:

Treating our allies with respect and a good time. What a winning formula!

Pelosi Touts Muslim Religion While Ignoring Enslavement of Women

Whatever happened to the separation of church and state? Does it not apply to mosques?

During the recent wave of hyperbole and distortion by Democrats following Trump's Executive Order on Immigration House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi trotted out Indiana Rep. Andre Carson, whom she introduced as a “Muslim member of Congress.”

Not content to let that slide, Pelosi quietly whispered on an open mic to Carson: "tell them you're a Muslim."

Does anyone think Pelosi would EVER do that with a Christian? Pelosi and other Democrats have been silent on the genocide against Christians around the world and the enslavement of young women forced to be sex slaves for radical Islamic terrorists. The New York Times called the ISIS enslavement of women "A Theology of Rape" yet Pelosi and other Democrats who take to the streets in protest against Trump's order turn a blind eye. But just wait until the next false charge of rape on an American college campus and Pelosi and friends will gin up the outrage machine once more.

Pelosi: Friend to Muslims and Murderers

Pelosi ignored U.S. Law and Bush Administration pleading by holding
meeting as House Speaker with Bashir Assad in Damascus Syria 2007.
But we shouldn't overlook Pelosi's insistence that the speaker above identify himself as a Muslim. Pelosi has a soft spot for Muslims and the more evil the better. Perhaps readers have forgotten her meeting, as then House Speaker, with Bashir Assad, President of Syria. She met in the Syrian capital against the wishes of Bush Administration foreign policy officials and that event helped bring a certain level of legitimacy to Assad who went on to butcher children by the thousands.

How do Democrats square their identity on behalf of women's rights with their newfound desire to link themselves more closely with Muslims? By ignoring reality. Here's the reality of what Islamic Law means to women around the world:

Nancy Pelosi. Friend to Muslims everywhere!

Saturday, February 11, 2017

Democrat's Revive Segregationist Protest by Blocking School Doors to Education Sec. DeVos

A system that once blocked poor black children from receiving a quality education is being revived to block reforms that would primarily aid poor black children in failing public schools!

Fifty four years ago Alabama Governor George Wallace, A DEMOCRAT, shouted "segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever." This is the same DEMOCRAT who stood in the door of a public school months later blocking access to black children:

George Wallace bars black students from public school. Dems today bar reformers
from fixing those schools and damage black kids opportunities for education.
Now, anti-education reform protesters, who blindly protest everything Trump stands for, blocked newly confirmed Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos from entering a public school in Washington, DC this week. First they attempted to block her vehicle from entering school grounds. Next, they races ahead of her and blocked steps to a side entrance. Video here.

DeVos later entered the school anyway despite physical effort to block here. Protesters represent a failed
education system that punishes poor black and minorities in two tier education.
Democrats are desperate to protect failing schools that remain a lucrative source of funds from corrupt teacher's unions. Stooges here blocking DeVos don't care about children. It's all about money and power. Follow the money here and it's a safe bet it leads right back to George Soros, who attempts to bring back "the happiest year of my life" working for the NAZIS rounding up Jews in Hungary!

Friday, February 10, 2017

Winston Churchill Quote is Perfect Description of Anti-Trump Radicals!

On Sir Winston Churchill's last visit to Parliament at the age of 90 the New York Times put out a sampling of the best Churchill quotes.  They are a legacy of wisdom and experience which continue to speak to the times we are in. For example:

Perhaps that explains why Obama removed the bust of Churchill from the Oval Office and Trump restored it!

Thursday, February 09, 2017

9th Circuit Court Ignores Clear Power of the President and Upholds Stay on Trump Immigration Plan

What a waste of time!

Despite this example of "legislating from the bench" the legally vested powers of the President are very clear in this case:

From Gregg Jarrett:
President Trump may have lost the early legal skirmishes over his executive order on immigration, but in the end he will likely win.

The overwhelming weight of history and the law is on his side. The president does have the authority to ban the entry of foreigners, as long as he has what is called a “rational basis” to believe they pose a threat to the nation’s security. He does, and his order is designed to accomplish precisely that.

The seven nations targeted by Trump in his immigration ban were originally identified in an anti-terrorism law signed by President Obama. Unlike other Muslim-majority nations that have a history of terrorism, these seven countries do not assist the U.S. in providing background checks and other vetting of immigrant applicants. Thus, it is not only “rational” to deny entry, it is imperative for the safety of Americans. The U.S. does not have the resources to properly vet all these individuals on its own.

Shortly after the executive order was put in place, several federal court judges issued temporary restraining orders. Most of those TROs halted the detention and deportation of foreigners who had already been issued legal immigration visas. Many had already arrived in the U.S.

But that is a very small part of the president’s order. The merits of those TROs, not to mention the president’s order itself, have yet to be fully litigated. The judicial rulings were issued “ex parte”. That is, only one side was represented in court. The Trump administration lawyers haven’t even been given a chance to appear in court to say, “good morning, your honor.” All of that may change once both sides are represented in court.

The Washington State Case

The ruling in Seattle by U.S. District Court Judge James Robart was different and far more expansive. He issued a temporary hold on the immigration ban nationwide. Lawyers at the Department of Justice appealed to the 9th Circuit which refused to overturn Judge Robart’s ruling, although further briefs have been filed. Thereafter, the 9th Circuit could revisit its decision.

It is no surprise that the 9th Circuit got it wrong. It is the most overturned appellate court in the nation. There’s a joke among California lawyers: if you lose your case in the 9th Circuit, you’re assured of winning it before the Supreme Court. Get the picture?

Nevertheless, the Seattle ruling is the case to watch, in part because Washington became the first state to sue. Take a look at judge Robart’s decision. It is largely devoid of any legal reasoning or sound analysis. Its brevity is exceeded only by its lack of logic as applied to the law.

Absence of Standing to Sue

Washington State does not have “standing” to sue on behalf of its residents because they have suffered no "actual harm" from Trump's order.

In order to sustain a lawsuit, the plaintiffs must demonstrate their alleged injury is direct and real, not merely hypothetical. The harm must be imminent and irreparable, not speculative.

So how have Washington residents been harmed? Lawyers for the state suggest their economy will be adversely impacted because the ban may prevent immigrants from working for Washington-based companies. Taxes might be reduced and its education system could be affected.

However, all of that is pure conjecture. It might happen, but it might not. Hence, it does not constitute immediate “actual harm.” On that basis alone, the lawsuit should be dismissed.

Foreigners Do Not Enjoy Constitutional Rights

The vast majority of people affected by President Trump’s executive order are people who do not have legally valid immigration visas but are seeking entry to the United States by undertaking the lengthy application process. We are talking about hundreds of thousands of people.

The claim by Washington State that the immigration ban violates the First Amendment (freedom of religion) or the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments (equal protection clause) may seem, at first blush, like a reasonable argument. Until you consider that our Constitution applies only to citizens and those on American soil.

A man in Somalia may wish to invoke our Constitution to claim his freedom of religion is being infringed, but until he arrives here he enjoys none of its privileges and protections. He has no right to assert discrimination, religious or otherwise. And the state of Washington has no legal right to represent him in court. It can only represent its own residents.

The President Has Authority to Dictate Immigration

Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate immigration. In 1952, Congress passed a law empowering the president to deny entry into the U.S. to “any class of aliens” considered to be “detrimental to the interests of the United States.” In other words, a threat to America and in the interests of national security.

As I pointed out in a recent column, the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that Congress and the president have “plenary power” to regulate immigration. For more than a century, the high court has consistently upheld such authority and rejected constitutional challenges to presidential action banning entire groups of foreigners. Even the 9th Circuit has endorsed this legal principle. Past presidents, including Carter and Obama, have issued orders similar to Trump’s.

It is true that a subsequent 1965 immigration law prohibits discrimination based on race, sex, nationality, place of birth or place of residence. But that law says nothing about religion. And, more importantly, it applies only to the issuance of visas. The president’s authority to deny entry to a large class of aliens is a broader power which supersedes individual visa considerations.

Trump’s Executive Order Is Temporary

Lost in all the legal tumult is the fact that President Trump’s executive order is only temporary: It applies for just 90 days for people in the seven designated countries that are sources of terrorism and 120 days for “refugees.” (The Syrian ban is “indefinite,” but that could change, too.)

By the time each side has had the opportunity to fully litigate the merits of the various cases and undertaken the usual course of appeals, the executive order will likely have expired. That may render most of the cases moot. Absent a legal controversy, there would be nothing for judges to resolve. The petitions and lawsuits would probably be dismissed.

For now, however, the Seattle case may head to a hearing before the full complement of judges on the 9th Circuit Court, known as an “en banc” session. Or, the Department of Justice may seek an emergency application to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The latter action might be imprudent, since the current court has only eight sitting justices. A 4-4 tie would allow the 9th Circuit’s decision to stand. It would make more sense to wait for the confirmation of Neil Gorsuch to cast the ninth, and perhaps deciding, vote. Given the great weight of the law in favor of the president, the decision should be unanimous. But why take the chance?
Democrats and the left have wasted more time defending immigrants from states that sponsor terror with this futile effort to block Trump! Shouldn't they be more worried about American citizens FIRST?

Big Wins As Trump Cabinet Gets DeVos and Sessions!

Now, give me Scott Pruitt at EPA!

Dismantling the Obama era government overreach won't be easy or quick. Democrats are doing everything they can to block Trump cabinet nominees who will lead that fight. There has been an unprecedented obstruction by Senate Democrats in the confirmation process resulting in a significant slowdown in the ability of those nominees to take office quickly.

But it's no more Mr. Nice Guy, at least for now, for Senate Republicans who have had it with the violation of standards of Senate conduct in Dem's blind obstruction. Dems have poisoned the water of polite, civil discourse and now complain about the smell in the water. Little good will it do them.

Two big confirmations this week.

Betsy DeVos, Secretary of Education: She's empowered to fix failing public schools and dramatically enrich the education experience, especially for inner cities minority children who have been held hostage by the teacher's unions.

Jeff Sessions, Attorney General: After years in the U.S. Senate he knows what's wrong with the Department of Justice and he'll restore the rule of law to a department which was grossly politicized during the past eight years!

Meanwhile, a new tax plan is in the works and House GOP leaders vow to move forward with the repeal and replacement of ObamaCare. America is going back to work and Trump will MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Sunday, February 05, 2017

Life of Critically Ill Patient Put at Risk As Anti-Trump Protesters Block Ambulance

Once again, left wing fascists put THEIR rights before everyone else!

It's not just that the left puts the desires of foreigners trying to enter the U.S. before the RIGHTS of American citizens, they also put the lives of Americans at risk for the sake of their own narcissistic protests.

Another case surfaced over the weekend of a protest in New Haven Connecticut which tied up traffic and blocked an ambulance with a critically ill patient from getting to the hospital. From the New Haven Independent:
According to a state police arrest, the demonstrators “obstructed an ambulance carrying a critically ill patient. Due to this delay ambulance personnel were required to perform an emergency medical procedure in the ambulance instead of at the hospital.” (Asked if the patient in the ambulance was OK, a state police spokeswoman responded, “Contact the hospital.” A hospital spokesman said he did not have information.)
A city police officer asked one of the protesters to move out of the way of an emergency vehicle, according to shift commander Lt. Sam Brown. Brown said the man refused to move. “The officers tried to guide him out of the way. He pushed an officer trying to get back.” The officers brought him to the ground and arrested him. (See photo at the top of the story.)

The arrestee, a barista at a downtown coffee shop, could not be reached for comment as this story was published.
Two arrests were made. That's one more arrest than at the mayhem in Berkeley California earlier in the week. Along with the ambulance blocker, one of the organizers was arrested. He knocked over his own supporters in an effort to flee from the police.

One protester wailed that the police with their dog was like being in "Selma." Another example of how delusional these loons are in pretending to be so abused by law enforcement. I'd say "show me where the dog bit you" before I listen to your complaints!

It's time to start cracking down on these fools. How is it that they get away with flaunting the law and abusing the rights of others while calling the rest of us fascists?
fsg053d4.txt Free xml sitemap generator