Judge Roberts' family at the White House during his nomination announcement.
A new low, as reported in the Drudge Report:The NEW YORK TIMES is looking into the adoption records of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate the status of adoption records of Judge Roberts' two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.
Roberts' young son Jack delighted millions of Americans during his father's Supreme Court nomination announcement ceremony when he wouldn't stop dancing while the President and his father spoke to a national television audience.
Previously the WASHINGTON POST Style section had published a story criticizing the outfits Mrs. Roberts had them wear at the announcement ceremony.
It's worse than that folks! Not only is the Times digging for dirt on Roberts' adopted children, not only did the Post run a distasteful column on the kids appearance, but in the dark corners of socialist hell holes they are saying much worse. I won't validate those cretins by repeating it, but suffice it say that if you said that about a liberal nominee's family there would be riots.
Roberts is about the tamest, least controversial nominee that President Bush could appoint. But the left demonstrates yet again a propensity to show more bile than brains and no inclination to act in the bipartisan manner which epitomized radical Justice Ginsburg (get rid of Mothers Day and the Boy and Girl Scouts) Ginsburg.
After witnessing the opening shots in this sad parade of left wing desperation I am glad that we have FOUR MORE YEARS! And frankly, Mr. President, you might as well make the next appointment an "in your face" conservative. I'm recommending Ann Coulter.
No comments:
Post a Comment