Now, the Brits are preparing to step in the moldy fromage by replacing Pierce Brosnan, and the darker coiffed James Bonds of the past with a blondie, Daniel Craig.
Bond Fans of the World Unite and Protest This Outrage!
For diehard Bond fans, there is only one 007, and his real name is Sean Connery. Even though true fans appreciate the contributions of Australian George Lazenby, and the unfortunate Timothy Dalton, and many of us have accepted Pierce Brosnan, whose portrayal of the famous fictional character was much more sophisticated and less cartoonish than the sometimes over the top bubble gum and popcorn work of Roger Moore (Moonraker anyone?).The news that Daniel Craig may fill the role of this important cultural icon fills devotees of the Bond franchise with a sense of dread and foreboding.
I ask producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson: where is your loyalty to your fans? Year after year we have been shelling out good money to view your films. How do we know this relative unknown is qualified for such a vital cultural role?
I realize it may be sexist to suggest this, but no doubt, the publicity campaign which released this photo of Daniel Craig's back side is a craven attempt to appeal to women. But should that be enough to convince loyal fans of his suitablity?
However, I am willing to wait and see the film, slated as a remake of the classic "Casinoe Royale." Yet, I feel it difficult to imagine that there could ever be a replacment for the David Niven spoof by the same name. Can there be a better performance in that film than Deborah Kerr as Agent Mimi/Lady Fiona McTarry and drunken Scots?
I just may have to boycott this new Bond and wait until it's offered for free on cable.
No comments:
Post a Comment