How the Left Cooks the Reporting on Global Warming

Envirozealots aren't very subtle about their attempt to influence the ongoing debate!

When the BBC reported that the UN's World Meteorological Organization confirmed that global temperature increases have been stalled since 1998, the envirozealots had a cow!

How dare the BBC report the news accurately without spinning it to insist that even though this information is true, global warming is real and man is to blame!

One envirozealot took it upon herself to educate the reporter and via email, repeatedly "demanded" a change in the story. And guess what? After first insisting they wouldn't change the story, the BBC folded and made the changes demanded by the envirozealot.

Jennifer Marohasy, the global warming skeptic whose views we featured in a post two weeks ago got ahold of the email exchange between the BBC reporter and the envirozealot.

In it, the envirozealot used the full set of big lie talking points on manmade global warming which included:

• The big lie that the scientists who fail to agree with the envirozealots "sky is falling" scaremongering are not credible scientists in the field. It doesn't seem to matter to these liars that this lie has been exposed time and time again.
• When the reporter first refused to change his article the envirozealot responded that it was "highly irresponsible to play into the hands of the sceptics/skeptics" and threatened to post the reporters email so that others could "add to" the reporters knowledge.
• After another refusal the envirozealot responded that "This is not an issue of "debate". This is an issue of emerging truth." Then, "It would be better if you did not quote the sceptics."

Finally, the envirozealot said that if the reporter refused to change the story in the way demanded, the e.z. would:

"have to conclude that you are insufficiently educated to be able to know when you have been psychologically manipulated. And that would make you an unreliable reporter."

Pretty transparent who is doing the manipulation here isn't it? After that last screed the reporter gave in and changed the story to spin it in favor of the envirozealots scaremongering viewpoint.

Funny thing is that the e.z. (envirozealot) admitted that climate science is in it's infancy. And yet she makes absolute statements of fact which are NOT founded on hard science based on observation. The only "emerging truth" here is that the e.v.'s are the real deniers of a sound scientific process. And they are expecting all of us to accept their flawed conclusions at face value without debate.