If you recall anything of your high school science course it will likely be this: theories are tested by experimentation and observation. If you observe actual data to support your theory then it lends credence to it. If however, the data that is observed fails to support your theory then the theory is false.
Unfortunately, the nexus between liberal politicians and liberal scientists has created a belief that manmade global warming is serious fact that cannot be ignored and that extreme measures must be taken immediately to combat it. Despite the fact that year after year the evidence mounts to contradict these beliefs, the insistence on immediate action remains.
Well, here's another published, peer reviewed paper from credible scientists (remember how the alarmists insisted that NO credible scientist disputed the alarmist's claims) that punches huge holes in the "theory:"
New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming AlarmismJust as it was with hyped hurricane predictions and other observations which contradict alarmist beliefs, the trend is clear: honest observations are showing the scare over global warming to be devoid of any factual basis.
By James Taylor
July 27, 2011
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth’s atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.
Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA’s Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models.
“The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show,” Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release. “There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.”
In short, the central premise of alarmist global warming theory is that carbon dioxide emissions should be directly and indirectly trapping a certain amount of heat in the earth’s atmosphere and preventing it from escaping into space. Real-world measurements, however, show far less heat is being trapped in the earth’s atmosphere than the alarmist computer models predict, and far more heat is escaping into space than the alarmist computer models predict.
When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, show a “huge discrepancy” between alarmist climate models and real-world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials would be wise to take notice. Whether or not they do so will tell us a great deal about how honest the purveyors of global warming alarmism truly are.
Yet alarmists like former Vice President Al Gore continue to get rich by pushing "green" projects which are hugely expensive and less efficient in terms of energy provided. I daresay the amount of money being wasted by the federal government on green projects would go a fair way to lessening the federal deficit if the money were not spent.
But of course, we all know that the real motive behind "green" projects is to enrich liberals and grow government at the expense of the freedom and financial well being of the citizenry! Global warming may one day be fully exposed as a hoax, but the desire to control the public and enrich liberals will continue!