Trump Lawsuit in Pennsylvania Election Gives Direct Evidence Showing Dems Broke/Ignored Vote Law

 Again, if Biden is so confident of his election why hasn't he called for full transparency in these Democrat vote counting centers?

The Pennsylvania court filing is over 100 pages long. It's stuffed with examples of violations of Pennsylvania election law and violations of the U.S. Constitution. Here's the Cliff Notes version:

WSJ: President Trump’s presidential campaign on Monday asked a federal judge to block Pennsylvania election officials from certifying the results of the election.

Matthew Morgan, a Trump campaign lawyer, alleged at a press conference in Washington that Republicans were unfairly treated in Pennsylvania’s election process and that GOP poll watchers weren’t able to closely observe mail-in ballot counting. He didn’t provide any evidence for his assertions.

Mr. Morgan said more than 682,000 ballots were counted in Philadelphia and Allegheny County while poll watchers were kept at a distance. “We believe that a meaningful review of those ballots could discern that there were ballots that were illegally counted,” Mr. Morgan said.

Among other issues, the lawsuit contends that in-person and mail-in ballot voters were treated differently, with some people who voted by mail being allowed to fix technical issues, such as a problem with a signature. The Trump campaign argued that the difference in treatment violates the U.S. Constitution.

Local election officials have previously said that they followed all applicable rules, some of which changed before the election due to the coronavirus pandemic.

The Trump campaign and two people identified as Pennsylvania voters filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania against the state’s secretary of state Kathy Boockvar, a Democrat.

A spokeswoman for Ms. Boockvar said the office doesn't comment on pending litigation.

The Trump campaign has previously filed lawsuits in state and federal court in Pennsylvania alleging observers weren't allowed close enough to meaningfully view the vote count.

They have filed additional lawsuits in battleground states such as Michigan, Nevada and Georgia, several of which they have lost.

Trump Lawsuit by Liberty Nation

Pennsylvania Republican legislative leaders are also stepping up to fulfill their responsiblity under the U.S. Constitution:

Pa House GOP members tomorrow will "call for a legislative-led audit of the 2020 election and demand election results not be certified, nor electors be seated, until the audit is complete," per news release.

— Andrew Seidman (@AndrewSeidman) November 9, 2020

A similar lawsuit has been filed in Michigan. Other states to follow: 

Lawsuit filed alleging elec... by Courtney Bennett

NEW: election fraud lawsuit was filed in Detroit with affidavits alleging backdating ballots, no matching signatures. It includes an affidavit from a city employee claiming she was asked to backdate ballots:

— Matt Finn (@MattFinnFNC) November 9, 2020

 Plaintiffs’ Complaint alleges many illegal and fraudulent actions by Defendants. For example:

• Ballots were counted even though the voter’s name did not appear in the official voter rolls.
• Election workers were ordered to not verify voters’ signatures on absentee ballots, to backdate absentee ballots, and to process such ballots regardless of their validity.
• Election workers processed ballots that appeared after the election deadline and falsely reported that those ballots had been received prior to November 3, 2020 deadline.
• Defendants used false information to process ballots, such as using incorrect or false birthdays. Many times, the election workers inserted new names into the QVF and recorded these new voters as having a birthdate of 1/1/1900.
• Defendants coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrat party. Election workers would go to the voting booths with voters to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.
• Unsecured ballots arrived at the TCF Center loading garage, not in sealed ballot boxes, without any chain of custody, and without envelopes.
• Defendants refused to record challenges to their processes and removed challengers from the site if they politely voiced a challenge.

All of these cases are backed up with dozens of sworn affadivits from eye witnesses. THERE'S YOUR EVIDENCE!