Saturday, January 13, 2018

Why Do Dems Insist on Bringing People from Sh#th#e Countries to U.S. And Why Are Haitians Protesting Clintons for Stealing Recovery Funds?

Leaked memo shows Dems depend on illegals and poor immigrants for votes!

So, the sh#t hits the fan when Trump asks the obvious question: Why are Dems so insistent on admitting immigrants from the poorest countries? Immigrants who possess few needed skills, are barely literate in their own language let alone English and who have little hope of successfully integrating and assimilating into American society? It's all about creating yet another underclass to exploit now that many blacks are finally wising up and leaving the plantation.

Former Clinton White House and Hillary campaign communications chief Jennifer Palmeri admits in a leaked memo that illegals and other immigrants are key to Democrats electoral strategy. Not that this was news. Back in 2006 I posted the flier at right urging Mexicans to vote in a Texas election.

It's also true that Mexico and other poor countries have encouraged poor citizens to go to "el Norte." A study from the University of California at Santa Cruz describes how:
At least since the Salinas presidency (1988-1994), the Mexican government's rural development strategy has been based on the assumption that a large proportion of the rural poor would leave their homes and move either to the cities or to the United States. The government abandoned support for family farming and peasant agriculture became a target of welfare policy rather than production support -- a shift that weakened the economic base of indigenous communities....
Mexico went so far as to issue a comic book for their illiterate citizens showing them how to migrate illegally. As I said in 2006 what Mexico is doing is akin to Stalin's era of collectivization. And it hasn't stopped since then. It might not be so bad if new arrivals to the U.S. learned English and sought to understand our political traditions and history but that time honored technique of creating AMERICANS out of immigrants has been deemed racist and offensive by left wing thought police.

It seems Democrats want new arrivals to remain outside the mainstream of American society. All the better to exploit them as oppressed.

Sen. Lindsey Graham 2013: "we can’t have everybody in the world who lives in a hellhole come to America."

GRAHAM: “The people coming across the southern border live in hellholes. They don’t like that. They want to come here. Our problem is we can’t have everybody in the world who lives in a hellhole come to America,” Mr. Graham said during a 2013 debate in the Judiciary Committee on an immigration bill he co-authored.
Trump Was Right

Much was made of what Trump said, or DIDN'T SAY, depending on who you ask about "sh#th#e" countries. The fact is, he was right.
NRO The Corner: The UN Human Development Index, the most widely accepted metric for how not like a well — you know what — a given country is, ranks Norway (the country Trump mentioned he wanted more immigrants from), as No. 1 in the world. El Salvador ranked 117th. Haiti was 163rd, and every single one of the 25 countries ranked below it (with the exception of the garden spots of Afghanistan and Yemen) was in Africa. All other things being relatively equal, why shouldn’t we want immigrants from countries with healthy functioning societies that are doing well, people who have grown up enmeshed in strong institutions—rather than some of the world’s most impoverished and dysfunctional places?
And from the American Spectator:
Is there any question Haiti is a s***hole? Who’s offended by that? If it wasn’t a s***hole it wouldn’t be one of the most prominent recipients of American charity aid on Planet Earth. And it isn’t like this country has ignored Haiti — we’ve been trying to lift it out of s***hole status for more than a century, with absolutely no result whatever.
Clintons Looted Haiti Recovery to Line Their Pockets

And speaking of all the billions in aide to Haiti, why such poor results? Well, one reason is that the people who were supposed to deliver aide lined their own pockets. They either engaged in projects that had little impact for Haitians but a big payoff for the so called "relief" teams or they just didn't deliver at all. And who was at the center of this disgrace? Bill and Hillary Clinton. State Department emails are replete with examples of how those who were donors or connected to the Clintons were first in line to provide "relief" that never arrived. The corruption stunk so bad that Haitians gathered outside Bill's presidential office in New York to protest:
Sign reads: Bill Clinton where is the money?
Haitians on social media share their disgust:

@HillaryClinton You robbed HAITI OF ITS GOLD You don't give a f**** about Black people or anyone but your own family https://t.co/Q3sn74NcAR
— Magaman (@secondsunrising) June 9, 2016
Apparently everyone but the Dems understands that you can't solve the world's problems by importing the world's poor and illiterate masses into the U.S.  And this isn't just about Haiti. Recall the discussion on Syrian refugees.

Trump's comment highlighted the problem perfectly. As Sen. Graham said, we can't have everyone from some "hellhole" come here. Why not do more to HELP them stay where they are? But to do so means breaking the cycle of corruption that keeps the poor poor while enriching people like the Clintons and their friends. That's a tall order but if anyone can do it Trump can!

P.S. Speaking of racist or offensive comments, why no outrage when Obama said: " There are white folks, and then ignorant mother (bleep) like you." or called Mitt Romney a "bullsh#er."

No comments:

fsg053d4.txt Free xml sitemap generator